Talk:Natal Border Guard
Appearance
Natal Border Guard has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: April 12, 2021. (Reviewed version). |
A fact from Natal Border Guard appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 17 April 2019 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Natal Border Guard/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 01:52, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- Is there a link for Zululand? Possibly Zulu Kingdom?
- I've changed it so I've used Zulu Kingdom at the first mention (as it relates to the political entity) and Zululand after (as it refers to the territory), hopefully the reader will make the connection
- "The dispute between Bulwer and Chelmsford over the deployment of the Border Guard came to an end on 15 July 1879 when Garnet Wolseley assumed the role of supreme British civil and military commander in the region." - How did Wolseley handle the deployment of the Border Guard? Bulwer's method, or the more aggressive ones advocated by other leaders?
- The war was effectively over by the time Wolseley got on the scene. Laband notes he had disarmed the Border Guard by the end of July. I've added that info
- "The Natal Border Guard was disbanded following the end of the war, there is no record of the date this occurred but the NNC was disbanded in September and the related Natal Pioneers in October" - Two independent clauses, so I think this should be either split or joined with a semicolon instead of a comma
- Went for a semi-colon
- Remove the p. 24 part from the Thompson 2006 citation, as more than just that page is cited. The p. 115 for Dutton probably isn't needed, either, as the page numbers are included in the short citations.
- Done, think they were leftover from the previous citation style
- For the infobox image, can we get a page number for the source? A 449-page PDF isn't a very specific source link
- Done
Looks good beyond that. Sources seem to be reliable enough, prose is excellent, seems to be good coverage, licensing looks fine, etc. Placing on hold. Hog Farm Talk 15:10, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Hog Farm, many thanks for reviewing (and so speedily!). I've made the changes noted above, cheers - Dumelow (talk) 16:28, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Warfare good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- GA-Class British Empire articles
- Unknown-importance British Empire articles
- All WikiProject British Empire pages
- GA-Class South Africa articles
- Low-importance South Africa articles
- GA-Class African military history articles
- African military history task force articles
- WikiProject South Africa articles
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class British military history articles
- British military history task force articles
- GA-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles