Talk:Nancy Kates

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

Untitled

Why did someone remove the paragraph about the incident at the airport? It was a major news event and was featured on several websites in addition to many newspapers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.153.103.8 (talk) 22:59, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

People keep deleting the paragraph about the airport incident. Is there any valid reason for doing this? The incident at the airport is probably the most widely reported thing about Nancy Kates and is probably what she's best known for.76.21.115.247 (talk) 08:49, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why was information about the airport incident deleted, this time by an admin, without any discussion? StradTrumpeter (talk) 14:44, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why?

Why are people warring to keep this in? It's unencyclopedic gossip, and has absolutely no place in this article. Taking to the talk page as suggested. PeterSymonds (talk) 16:49, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm re-adding it to the page. It was a major news story and the time and I would assert that she's more notable for that incident than she is for everything else on this page, at least to the average individual.StradTrumpeter (talk) 17:44, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have to disagree with that assessment. In its current form, there isn't even an indication that the passenger involved in the incident is the same Nancy Kates the rest of the article is about. It seems a minor incident with no lasting impact. Plus, there are arguably WP:BLP issues. For that reason and per WP:UNDUE I'll remove the section. Huon (talk) 22:46, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've added an additional citation from the Boston Herald that confirms that the Nancy Kates in question is a documentary filmmaker. I strongly disagree with your assessment of potential BLP or undue issues. The incident clearly happened, the article isn't about just that incident, and it is noteworthy. If you do a search for "Nancy Kates" in Google the airport incident is currently the third search result. Just because she may not like that she's known for this incident is no reason to not include it. She willingly gave her name and a statement to a news reporter. She has no basis to claim that it should be off-limits to wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by StradTrumpeter (talk • contribs) 04:47, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think the problem here is that this whole thing reeks of the profound sexism that women experience in other parts of the Web. If the incident in question were not about a bra, the people working so hard to put it in--at the expense of the person it concerns--seem to want to talk about her underwear instead of her achievements. Sorry, dudes. That is sexism. Wikipedia should not be letting some misogynist alter the profile of a serious filmmaker. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SSontag (talk • contribs) 22:50, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I do not agree. — Preceding unsigned comment added by StradTrumpeter (talk • contribs) 00:39, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

StradTrumpeter is blocked as a disruptive WP:SPA. Pretty much all that account has done, for over five years, is insert this salacious trivium. Guy (Help!) 12:54, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Nancy Kates. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20030216042554/http://rustin.org/ to http://www.rustin.org/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130426011924/http://sontagfilm.org/team/ to http://sontagfilm.org/team/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:14, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]