User talk:StradTrumpeter

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

That was impressively stupid. You are now blocked not just as a disruptive single purpose account whose purpose violates our policy on biographies, but as a block-evading sockpuppeteer, per 2605:E000:1605:C0C0:3D3D:A148:3039:71F1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Which means that you can probably consider yourself banned. Guy (Help!) 15:33, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

StradTrumpeter (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

1. This is not a single purpose account. Other articles that I've been involved with that I can remember off the top of my head are Geek Squad and america Hoffman. 2. Any sockpuppeting was unintentional. 3. My edits to the Nancy Kates article were well-sourced and factual. I attempted to take the debate to the talk page of the article, but was routinely ignored there. 4. Your actions and tone indicate your bias in this matter. A neutral third party should decide this, not you. StradTrumpeter (talk) 15:48, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I agree with the blocking administrator here. Your account seems to be coming back to this page to put that section in again and again despite its removal on BLP grounds. My suggestion if you want to be unblocked? Agree to a topic ban that states that you will not edit the Nancy Kates article. You might be a productive editor on other pages, but your edits there are not appropriate and will continue to be removed. only (talk) 16:35, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.