Talk:Nancy Hopkins (scientist)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Women scientists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

The section dealing with the Summers Incident is more persuasive than encyclopedic and is extremely biased in favor of Hopkins. The whole page should probably be removed since this person is only a public figure because of this incident and would otherwise not meet the requirements for notability, —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.89.188.172 (talk) 19:00, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I have changed some of the wording to reflect a more NPOV. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.90.235.57 (talk) 06:21, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have added specific sections for each controversy, and also some counterpoint which I trust will make the wording consistent with there being an actual controversy about this topic and of the interpretation of Hopkins' actions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.90.239.129 (talk) 21:59, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Harassment Incident by Francis Crick" section

Why is this a level-2 section on her biography? That seems really inappropriate, as her accusation is presumably not what she's primarily known for. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 05:29, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]