Talk:Nancy 7

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Lebanon Low‑importance

	Lebanon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lebanon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lebanon-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LebanonWikipedia:WikiProject LebanonTemplate:WikiProject LebanonLebanon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Neutrality of the article

I'm sorry, but this article has almost no sources, and is, in fact, one giant celebration to, and a fan page for Nancy Ajram. I've added the clean up label because of all this. Robster1983 (talk) 11:15, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality of the article, part II

More sources and a way more neutral style of writing is needed. Sections needing clean-up/different style of writing are:

1. Development and release: No sources added whatsoever.
2. Composition and musical styles: No sources have been added whatsoever.
3. Promotion: Seems as if the promotion continues on this page. Of course Nancy's manager says that something is "the best music video we've shot yet." I would drop the following line: Contrary to the lead single, "Sheikh El Shabab" has a comical music video which her manager described as "the best music video we've shot yet."
4. Rumors: Such sections are dicey to begin with here on Wikipedia, and are most of the times removed, for Wikipedia is not a gossip magazine. And naming a subsection Rumors, here, on Wikipedia, is just like (knowingly or without intent) plunging in open water with a big open wound in front of a great white shark: both don't stand a chance. However, if sources can be found, then maybe someone could add it to/blend it with the subsection of Development and release? Otherwise it's best to be removed.

Other than that, I also must say: kudos to all the people who put effort in the article adding all them sources, it really improved!! Again big kudos!!! :) Robster1983 (talk) 22:08, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]