Talk:NYT first said

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Internet culture Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Linguistics Low‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from NYT first said appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 November 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that @NYT_first_said's most popular tweet, as of 2019, was simply "shithole"?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2023/November. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/NYT first said.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet talk 06:22, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Profile picture of NYT_first_said

... that NYT_first_said's most popular tweet, as of 2019, was simply "shithole"? Source: Symonds 2019.
- Reviewed: End Poem
- Comment: nice to be back on this side of the DYK process for a bit! Oh, and thank you to Tamzin for introducing me to the topic :D

Created by Theleekycauldron (talk). Self-nominated at 03:44, 6 November 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/NYT first said; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: New reviewer here, really interesting article and eye catching hook. While not strictly in the guidelines I'm just wondering if the image adds anything here, since it is just a wordmark of the twitter account. No issues otherwise. Sohom (talk) 14:21, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for the review, Sohom! The image isn't fantastic; generally, if it clears minimal guidelines, the reviewer can approve and the promoter (discussion closer) can choose not to use it. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 17:38, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good,

Approved both the hook and image -- Sohom (talk) 18:54, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]