Talk:NCLEX-RN

this page has become full of spam, maybe it should be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.140.43.131 (talk • contribs) 18:44, 3 December 2008

WP:NURSE priority review

As part of a review of all nursing wikiproject articles, I have changed this article's importance to mid per Wikipedia:WikiProject Nursing/Assessment#Importance scale. I have also added start class. If you disagree, please leave a note here so we can discuss it. Cheers, Basie (talk) 03:17, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar and Spelling

This article's grammar and spelling appear to have been formulated by a non-native speaker, and therefore the article needs extensive cleanup.71.171.138.251 (talk) 22:46, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Great idea... go for it! :) Cheers, Basie (talk) 03:50, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

declined speedy, despammed

Likely an expandable, notable subject. Hopefully we can do more article writing and less advertising in the future. Not averse to seeing this taken to AFD is sentiment to delete remains. Dloh cierekim 15:58, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merging article with NCLEX

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result was merge into NCLEX. -- AriTotle (talk) 22:37, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss HERE

I don't see a reason why NCLEX-RN should have its own page, I think it should be merged with the NCLEX page. It's confusing and needless that NCLEX-RN has it's own page. Further, NCLEX is almost devoid of information, it will simultaneously expand that page while getting rid of this redundant page. AriTotle (talk) 01:10, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.