Jump to content

Talk:NBN (TV station)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleNBN (TV station) was one of the Media and drama good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 14, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
July 17, 2007Good article nomineeListed
May 17, 2009Good article reassessmentKept
June 15, 2023Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Article name 2016

[edit]

NBN's on-air branding was changed drastically on 1 March 2016 with its unique "NBN" branding beginning to be phased out in favour of Nine's mainstream branding in place on its metropolitan and Darwin stations. The station itself is still named "NBN" as shown on their official website and in other official media (this can be seen in other commercial network stations such as Seven's SAS Adelaide, Nine's NTD Darwin and Ten's ATV Melbourne), the only change is the station's on-air branding. In light of this, the page should keep the name NBN Television until such a time when the "NBN" on-air branding is phased out completely (then it can be renamed "NBN (TV station)" when NBN is fully integrated into Nine's mainstream network. Any further discussion can be made below. – Nick Mitchell 98 talk 07:28, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree completely. Both Nine and NBN have had fairly drastic changes in the past and they haven't automatically meant a name change. I spoke to some NBN people tonight and they said they weren't aware of a name change. I'll call the station itself tomorrow and, if they confirm it, in the absence of any verifiable sources confirming a name change, I'll move the article back. --AussieLegend () 13:44, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If the "NBN" branding is completely phased out wouldn't it become "9NBN" Awesomeman5555 (talk) 21:21, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On-air branding doesn't change the name of the company. --AussieLegend () 03:48, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Once the NBN brand completely disappears then this page can follow all the other Nine Network stations namings eg: "NBN (Television Station)" just like NWS and NTD etc. 220.240.66.253 (talk) 08:40, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not while NBN Television exists as an entity. --AussieLegend () 11:28, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on NBN Television. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:04, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on NBN Television. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:47, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Locally produced content. Location Lifestyle Living was unusual in that it had no funding. It was funded by advance advertising sales. The concept, funding, and planning was organised primarily by advertising executives Duncan Read and Marc Ritchie, and the program remains the only case of local content generated by advance advertising sales.

[edit]

Location Lifestyle Living was unusual in that it had no funding. It was funded by advance advertising sales. The concept, funding, and planning was organised primarily by advertising executives Duncan Read and Marc Ritchie, and the program remains the only case of local content generated by advance advertising sales. 172.195.8.220 (talk) 08:38, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment page • GAN review not found
Result: Significant issues concerning GA criterion 2. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:36, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA from 2007. This article is really poorly cited with numerous paragraphs that just have no citations. Bambots reports "Dead external links ((dead link)) (January 2016), Unsourced passages need footnotes ((citation needed)) (March 2016, July 2016, July 2021), ... (July 2021)" Onegreatjoke (talk) 18:19, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.