Talk:NASCAR Cup Series at Watkins Glen

NASCAR Mid‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject NASCAR, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to NASCAR. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, you can visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.NASCARWikipedia:WikiProject NASCARTemplate:WikiProject NASCARNASCAR articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contribute to the project:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

New York (state) Low‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.

Discussions:

Procedural close, 18 December 2022, from NASCAR Cup races at Watkins Glen to NASCAR Cup Series races at Watkins Glen, see discussion.
Moved, 16 April 2023, from NASCAR Cup races at Watkins Glen to NASCAR Cup Series at Watkins Glen, see discussion.

Sirius sponsorship

What happened to the Sirius Satellite Radio sponsorship? --Bigtop (tk|cb|em|ea) 16:03, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dunno; they just decided not to renew, probably because they're going to have the entire NASCAR season next year. -- DiegoTehMexican 14:20, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Images centurionglen webphoto.jpg

Image:Images centurionglen webphoto.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 03:16, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:CenturionBoatsAtTheGlen.gif

Image:CenturionBoatsAtTheGlen.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 13:13, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Constant name changes

I'm just curious; would it NOT be easier to generalise the names of all of the pages for Sprint Cup races? The sponsor or official name of the race changes for most races each year, which make for what I'm sure is much exhaustive work to change all of the names (and links) of pages pertaining to each race. Perhaps pages could be called California (Spring) and California (Fall), or Bristol (Day) and Bristol (Night), or what have you; something constant. Just a suggestion; to me that would seem easier than changing the names each year. 97.125.92.220 (talk) 05:50, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Cheez-It 355 at The Glen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:59, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rename to 'NASCAR Cup Series races at Watkins Glen' or some other sensible title

As far as I can tell there have never been any other Nascar Cup Series races held at Watkins Glen other than the races this article is referring to. I may be wrong of course, as articles on Nascar races on Wikipedia tend to be titled in a manner which is extremely confusing to outsiders and often seem to lack logical redirects. Constantly changing the title of the article to something which only represents the most recent race(s) is nonsensical. At present the man on the Clapham omnibus would, without strong existing knowledge of the article's subject, assume that this is an article about a bowling alley. Wikipedia's purpose is to serve as a general encyclopaedia, not a repository of pedantic trivia for those who already deeply invested in a subject. There is also the issue that insisting on using WP:OFFICIAL names will make it very easy for any astroturfing marketer who wants to use Wikipedia to make the product they are promoting seem more "legitimate" or whatever to do so by simply arguing "well that's the official title", thus potentially threatening Wikipedia's perceived neutrality. Almost any independent source I can find which is not in some way obviously incentivised to use official names (be it directly through sponsorship agreements or indirectly through access journalism) for Nascar Cup Series races at Watkins Glen will consistently refer to them as "the 1996 Cup Series race at Watkins Glen" or whatever and not by the sponsor name. 2A02:C7F:DC08:9000:514F:3A7:8D8D:C406 (talk) 20:42, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 18 December 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Procedural close. No valid rationale provided. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 18:48, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NASCAR Cup races at Watkins Glen → NASCAR Cup Series races at Watkins Glen – Place here your rationale for the proposed page name change, ideally referring to applicable naming convention policies and guidelines, and providing evidence in support where appropriate. If your reasoning includes search engine results, please prioritize searches limited to reliable sources (e.g. books, news, scholarly papers) over other web results. You don't need to add your signature at the end, as this template will do so automatically. Zrcook610 (talk) 16:55, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requested move 16 April 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Unopposed move. (closed by non-admin page mover) – Material Works (contribs) 11:28, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

NASCAR Cup races at Watkins Glen → NASCAR Cup Series at Watkins Glen – Consistency with lower series pages for similar purpose in "[series] at [track]" format (see NASCAR Xfinity Series at Martinsville as an example). (There was an attempt above but it was procedurally closed due to lack of reasoning... and it was by a sock, no less.) FMecha (to talk|to see log) 09:28, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.