This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the NA-123 Lahore-VII article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is written in Pakistani English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
@Ranaumershahzadgoga: It is not always necessary to list three positions. The third placed candidate should have competitive votes to be listed otherwise it is just not encyclopedic to list a candidate with nominal number of votes and increases clutter on pages. The second placed candidate have 50,000 votes and yours are 2,000. Not competitive enough in my opinion to list. @Masterpha and Saqib:, you being big contributors in Pakistani politics topic, please give your opinion, should we list this candidate with 2,000 votes separately? Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 01:23, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for the late response but I agree with Sheriff that if the third candidate is not competitive enough in relation to the top two then it shouldn’t be listed. маsтегрнатаLк23:36, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
