Talk:N-I (rocket)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the N-I (rocket) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
About the differences from Japanese N-I page
[edit]Partial information of this article is different from Japanese N-I page. The citations may indicate that N-I and N-II are derivative of Delta, but not itself. Especially, the 2nd stage of N-I is different from Delta (under-mentioned). There might be estimation on the analogy to N-II, which employed all Delta stage.
I think that the JAXA official N-I web page is more appropriate for the citation of dimensions. The same data are seen in WHITE PAPER ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 1982(in Japanese, see table 1-2-24).
Besides, according to the white paper, the propulsion system of N-I's 2nd stage was developed by domestic technique, and thrust and specific impulse of the engine, called LE-3, are 5.44 ton and about 290 sec, in vacuum, respectively. The LE-3 is seen in the JAXA Photo Archives.
By the way, it seems that N-I have 3 (not 9) boosters in the many pictures of N-I in the citations. According to the JAXA Photo Archive, N-I's thrust is about 150 ton (1st stage 80 ton + boosters 70 ton). It seems that Thor-ELT + 3x Castor2 is more suitable for the thrust. --Gwano (talk) 12:30, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
- In the ja:N-I talk page, there has been an indication that the N-I's boosters(3) and the second stage(LE-3) is also shown in Launch vehicles database in Jonathan's Space Home Page, which is cited by the reference-1 (Encyclopedia Astronautica). Is the citation worthy of being described? --Gwano (talk) 23:55, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on N-I (rocket). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6GnQRIrKc?url=http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/delta.htm to http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/delta.htm
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.journalarchive.jst.go.jp/jnlpdf.php?cdjournal=jjsass1969&cdvol=32&noissue=362&startpage=127&lang=ja&from=jnlabstract - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110704102309/http://202.228.55.2/ngpsw/introduction/history/index.html to http://202.228.55.2/ngpsw/introduction/history/index.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090909144812/http://jda.jaxa.jp/jda/p1_e.php to http://jda.jaxa.jp/jda/p1_e.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:46, 11 November 2017 (UTC)