Talk:Mysterious Ways (song)

Ireland Mid‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

U2 (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject U2, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.U2Wikipedia:WikiProject U2Template:WikiProject U2U2 articles

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Fair use rationale for Image:Mysterious ways.jpg

Image:Mysterious ways.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:08, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:MysteriousWays.jpg

Image:MysteriousWays.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 07:05, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Mysterious Ways (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090108013622/http://www.charts-surfer.de:80/musiksearch.php to http://www.charts-surfer.de/musiksearch.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:39, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 9 May 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No consensus to move — Amakuru (talk) 20:35, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

– The U2 song is clearly the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for the term; the song is viewed more than twice as often as the short-run TV show [1] Calidum ¤ 19:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose popularity-based primarytopic grab. The rationale of "viewed more than twice as often" is hardly convincing. Dicklyon (talk) 05:12, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support satisfies WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for both views and significance. Nohomersryan (talk) 13:24, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the page view figures 66% actually show a couple of dates when the TV show and song are 50/50. Given that there a few other minor subjects and that the hymn God Moves in Mysterious Ways is often miscalled "Mysterious Ways" this doesn't pass WP:PRIMARYTOPIC on either of the two criteria. In ictu oculi (talk) 20:30, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - not sufficiently meeting of the requirements for WP:PRIMARYTOPIC; a 2:1 ratio is not "much more likely". - Ryk72 ^'c.s.n.s.' 21:58, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How does 66 percent of views not meet the criteria that it be sought out "much more likely than any other topic, and more likely than all the other topics combined," the criteria laid out at WP:PTOPIC? Calidum ¤ 01:15, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Calidum, Respectfully, while I agree that 2:1 is "more likely than", I don't conceive that it is "much"-ly so. For "much more likely than", I would be looking at maybe 3:1 or higher. Hope this makes my !vote clearer. - Ryk72 ^'c.s.n.s.' 08:21, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

single sales certifications?

This single went to #9 US and #13 UK, was year-end #57 US, and was released before the radio-only charting era. So why is it the only certification we've found so far is from ARIA? Does anyone know if the single got any certifications in the US and UK? AllGloryToTheHypnotoad (talk) 23:31, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, other singles that go to #50-#70 on a Billboard year-end Hot 100 seem to generally get certified gold (500,000 copies). So I guess that's the minimum U2 would have done, especially since I would think their chart position was more from single sales and less from radio than your typical year-end Hot 100 song. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad (talk) 18:00, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]