Talk:Myco-heterotrophy

Myco-heterotrophy has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 14, 2006	Good article nominee	Not listed
June 22, 2006	Good article nominee	Listed
January 24, 2007	Peer review	Reviewed
May 9, 2009	Good article reassessment	Kept
Current status: Good article

Plants Mid‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fungi High‑importance

	Fungi portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fungi, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fungi on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FungiWikipedia:WikiProject FungiTemplate:WikiProject FungiFungi articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

New article

I just finished writing this article. I realize it still needs citations - I wrote it largely from memory, but will go over my literature soon so that I can incorporate proper citations into the article. I have also searched through (English) Wikipedia and changed over references to plants as "saprophytes" to "myco-heterotrophs". Peter G Werner 01:27, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Name of article

It was a coin toss between Myco-heterotrophy (describing the relationship) and Myco-heterotroph (describing the organism). It seemed proper to emphasize the ecological relationship rather than just the parasitic partner, so I went with the former. (Also, "Myco-heterotrophy" got more Google hits.) If I was wrong, somebody could always just move the article. Peter G Werner 03:31, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

References

I just added references. At some point I suppose I should wikify them, though its not high on my to-do list. Basically, I'm not a big fan of "ref" format – its a real pain in the ass to edit, since you have to intersperse entire bibliographic citations into the text of the article, plus the reference list is no longer in alphabetical order and looks beaten to crap once you're done. Peter G Werner 06:12, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article nomination has failed

The Good article nomination for Myco-heterotrophy has failed, for the following reason(s):

I think this article is long enough to warrant breaking up into a couple of sections - it would be an aesthetic improvement over a large block of text. It would then need a short lead section. Otherwise, the content looks good - please renominate once sections have been added. Worldtraveller 12:01, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Err, this is still on the nomination list, did it get back here so quickly? I was going to pass it heh, it seems to have plenty of books and article things there at the bottom..... Homestarmy 03:30, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I hadn't renominated it at the time you came by, but I have renominated it now, since I've made the changes suggested by Worldtraveller. Lots of links, its true – I hope its a kind of "one-stop shopping" for anybody who's interested in learning about the topic. Peter G Werner 05:46, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nomination passed

I think this is now GA material. I do recommend changing the references to the {{cite}} format, but that's not an official requirement so I don't feel it should hold the article back at this point. It would be a problem if the article ever reached FAC, though, and I personally think the new format is a lot easier to read and use. Otherwise, though, this meets all the criteria for Good Articles. I know very little about botany, but I found it interesting and understandable. Nice job. Kafziel 13:09, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA Sweeps

This article has been reviewed under the sweeps process to determine whether it remains to be in good condition. Although I have doubts of the permission of using this image, it appears that the uploader is an expert in this field and likely that he did receive expressed permission for imaage usage. An OTRS follow up would be great, but I will give the benefit of the doubt and assume good faith. Overall, the article is clear, detailed, and well-referenced to reliable sources. Based on this, I believe that this article is in good condition and remains to be an GA. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 17:54, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I received permission directly from Martin Bidortondo to use the image, and he also fact checked the article. The article could use some updating to incorporate more current research on these organisms, but otherwise I would say it gives a very good overview. Peter G Werner (talk) 05:46, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Myco-heterotrophy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:46, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Plant-Microbe Interactions Spring 2022

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 19 January 2022 and 6 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Plambertiana (article contribs).