Jump to content

Talk:My Great Predecessors

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A Questionable Source

[edit]

In the list of criticism about the "My Great Predecessors" series, who is Richard Forster, where is this "The Critical Eye" article, and what is the "Chess History Center"? I have never heard of any of these before, and it doesn't help that there is neither a link, an ISBN number, nor a reference to any newspaper or magazine. I have done an online search, but aside from showing that Forster has authored some chess history books in German, I have found nothing. I have also found zero evidence of a column called "The Critical Eye" anywhere. The reason I was initially skeptical is that Forster's particular criticism seems to come from someone who has never read a single book in the series. Kasparov uses a great deal of analysis made by others, yes, but always makes sure to attribute it to them, and then interjects his own analysis. And I have a copy of the first edition in Russian. By contrast, Edward Winter is the world's foremost chess historian, and his particular criticism is relevant and accurate. Anywho, if one can find an actual link to Forster's article or prove that it even exists (!), fine. But otherwise, I will remove it. ChessPlayerLev (talk) 11:08, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think attributing it to Forster may be an error because of this. Winter's criticism is here. I think the person probably saw Forster's name at the first webpage and they were talking about Winter's writing. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 15:49, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Winter actually does attribute the comment that appears in the article to a "Richard Forster", although I still can't find the existence of the review entitled "The Critical Eye". But at any rate, the article misuses the quote. The quote on Winter's page is supposedly talking about a single game in the book using previous analysis heavily (and it's never revealed which one), as opposed to being a persistent element throughout the book. (Which examines well over a hundred games) In addition, it is definitely hyperbole; "more than 95%" has been copied from "earlier sources"? Considering Kasparov has frequently used Fritz in his analysis, certainly more than 5% of the time, in every game, that seems impossible. And most analysis is indeed sourced to the players of the game or other earlier authors, too. Anyways, until one can find "The Critical Eye" as more than a single vague and exaggerated quote at the end of a Winter piece, I will take it out.ChessPlayerLev (talk) 22:12, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I think this is it? http://web.archive.org/web/20030727170317/http://www.chesshistory.com/ Fletch79 (talk) 12:38, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on My Great Predecessors. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:10, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on My Great Predecessors. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:00, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:My_Great_Predecessors&oldid=1204150888"