Talk:My Dear Melancholy
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the My Dear Melancholy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about My Dear Melancholy. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about My Dear Melancholy at the Reference desk. |
This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Should this project be referred to as a EP or studio album?
[edit]There seems to be a lot of contradicting statements online on whether this is an EP or a studio album. In the article should we refer to it as an EP or a studio album? --DovahDuck (talk) 11:49, 5 April 2018 (EST)
- @DovahDuck: I think this project is a EP instead an album, but that depends on the sources. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 16:15, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
- @DovahDuck: I'd personally consider it an EP, but techically, I'd say it is an album. As pointed out on the wikipage Extended play, "the Official Chart Company defines a boundary between EP and album classification at 25 minutes of maximum length or four tracks (not counting alternative versions of featured songs, if present)." My Dear Melancholy, is 21:50 long, and it has 6 tracks. So I believe it should be called an album. Johnnyboytoy (talk) 01:15, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
- @DovahDuck: Honestly it is an EP. When you go in the mini-album article it redirects to mini-LP, which is defined as "a short vinyl record album or LP", not a digital album; right at top of the page it says that EPs are releases marketed as "mini-albums" in Asia (which applies to this case too). I think that the editor who made the change should have go here and start this discussion before making the edits for these two reasons: it is not a vinyl record album or LP, and the way it was marketed as a "mini-album" is the same way as in Asia — actually an EP, not a short vinyl record album or LP. I think that we should refer to it as an EP (which actually is) but also with those observations — some consider it as an album, and others as an mini-album. Also, the Pitchfork review does not interfere if it's an EP or not, first: they are not associated with the label, if they made the change in their article it's their issue; and second, many other publications diverge whether it's an EP, an album or a mini-album. Music01 (talk) 02:03, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
The weekend
[edit]e elastic ocean 38.27.124.242 (talk) 21:31, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia articles that use Canadian English
- C-Class Canada-related articles
- Low-importance Canada-related articles
- C-Class Canadian music articles
- Low-importance Canadian music articles
- WikiProject Canadian music articles
- All WikiProject Canada pages
- C-Class R&B and Soul Music articles
- Low-importance R&B and Soul Music articles
- WikiProject R&B and Soul Music articles
- C-Class Pop music articles
- Low-importance Pop music articles
- Pop music articles
- C-Class Album articles
- WikiProject Albums articles