Talk:Muthu (film)

Muthu (film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 10, 2021. (Reviewed version).

Film: Indian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

India: Tamil Nadu / Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tamil Nadu (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Mcguy15, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 19 April 2021.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Poor quality

The write-up of the plot detail is of poor quality and not up to Wikipedia standards.

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 18:50, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New Data

anything from here: http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/1999/05/09/dancing-maharajas.html ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 05:04, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Muthu (1995 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:56, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Muthu (film)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 23:40, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:40, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox, Lead

Infobox looks good.
Remove the comma after "June 1995".

Done Kailash29792 (talk) 12:22, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Plot, Cast

The plot section passes WP:FILMPLOT.
Remove the comma after "company".
"passerbys" → "passerby"
Remove the comma after "agreed".
Remove the comma after "chase Ambalathar".
Remove the comma after "new zamindar".
The cast section looks good.

Solved all. Kailash29792 (talk) 12:22, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Production

The first sentence feels short (try merging it with the next).

See how it is now. Kailash29792 (talk) 12:08, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"editing handled" → "editing was handled"

Done. Kailash29792 (talk) 12:08, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remove the comma after "Raja Malayasimman".

Done. Kailash29792 (talk) 12:08, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remove the comma after "approached for the role".

Done. Kailash29792 (talk) 12:08, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remove the comma after "reluctance".

Done. Kailash29792 (talk) 12:08, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Recite references after every WP:QUOTE.

Themes

No issues here.

Music

Convert this into a subsection in #Production per WP:FILMMUSIC.

Done Kailash29792 (talk) 12:15, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Release

This section looks good.

Reception, Awards

Since these two sections are short, merge them together as two subsections under #Reception, preferably titled "Critical response" and "Accolades".
"simple hearted" → "simple-hearted"
"consisent" → "consistent"
The first section also appears to end abruptly so try fixing that.
Also remove the <br /> in the table (unnecessary).

Japanese version (Muthu Odoru Maharaja)

Current header feels kinda long. Maybe just "Japanese version"?
The last sentence in the second paragraph is unsourced.

Resolved both. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:06, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Legacy

No issues here.

References

Archive sources.

Archived everything possible. --Kailash29792 (talk) 11:47, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Progress

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·