Talk:Music of Detroit

	Michigan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Detroit task force.

United States: Music High‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Music portal This article is supported by WikiProject American music.

Regional and national music High‑importance

	Music of Detroit is within the scope of the WikiProject Regional and national music, an attempt at building a resource on the music of all the peoples and places of the world. Please visit the project's listing to see the article's assessment and to help us improve the article as we push to 1.0.Regional and national musicWikipedia:WikiProject Regional and national musicTemplate:WikiProject Regional and national musicRegional and national music articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fair use rationale for Image:Motown.jpg

Image:Motown.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:41, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jan 2008 edits

This page has been extensively and enthusiastically edited, but the material added needs to include sources, and be checked over for spelling, punctuation etc. Sorry, I don't have the source material to do it. --AndrewHowse (talk) 18:15, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removed George Clinton

I removed George Clinton from the list at the beginning since he is not a hometown star of Detroit. I wish, but no. 68.41.215.129 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 03:09, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

The tag says there are no citaions, but there are several. I have added to them, but more are still needed. --198.111.56.128 (talk) 00:42, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. I changed the template to "citations missing."

--Kzooman (talk) 23:29, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Circus1.jpg

The image Image:Circus1.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:

Image:TheSupremes.jpg

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --23:41, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hip hop section

This section contains exactly zero information about hip hop music in Detroit, it only talks about unreferenced and controversial so-called rivalries which are quite easily in violation of WP:BLP. This section needs to be fundamentally re-written to give some information about Detroit's hip hop music scene or it should be altogether deleted. SWik78 (talk • contribs) 15:04, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Contributions and references are welcome. Help out. Thomas Paine1776 (talk) 19:38, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I removed a claim by Insane Clown Posse that Detroit did not have a battle rap scene. This is entirely contradicted by the source I added which talks about Detroit's clothing store the Hip Hop Shop hosting rap battles which served as a launching point for rappers like Eminem. Just because ICP did not experience rap battles themselves doesn't mean that they didn't happen. RockabillyRaccoon (talk) 13:19, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References, cleanup

This is a fun article to read, particularly if one happens to remember a lot of it personally; but large sections of it are poorly sourced or not sourced at all. (Some of it reads like personal recollections, and may never be sourceable.) It gets a bit "listy" in parts too, which is the death of decent prose. I added the "references" template to the article today in the hope that folks might root around and find support for some of the material that's here. I may also take a stab at cleaning up some parts of it and invite others to help as well. JohnInDC (talk) 18:15, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Second largest theater district"

Houston and Cleveland make the same claim. I've raised the issue at Talk:Performing_arts_in_Detroit#.22Second_largest_theater_district.22 and am suggesting removing the assertion from this and any other articles that say the same thing (barring I suppose stumbling across something more definitive). I suggest we keep the conversation in one place, so I'm linking over to that one - thanks. JohnInDC (talk) 02:28, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Music of Detroit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100105174840/http://apps.detnews.com/apps/history/index.php?id=26 to http://apps.detnews.com/apps/history/index.php?id=26
Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.degc.org/arts-culture.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:06, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Music of Detroit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.standardmedia.co.ke/entertainment/thenairobian/article/2000134572/rapper-eminem-s-rap-god-breaks-guinness-world-record-for-having-most-words-in-hit-record

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:54, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notable artists

Is there a reason why the people on the list are alphabetized by their first names? Except for Icelanders, who, even in their phone books are done that way, on wikipedia list such as this are done by last name. However before I make changes I thought I'd check. Carptrash (talk) 15:41, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Be bold! JohnInDC (talk) 18:55, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Music of Detroit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:35, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Rook"

An editor has repeatedly inserted a reference to this 1980s band, along with a YouTube link as a reference. It has been removed as many times, for what seem to me to be several good reasons. The band's notability is questionable, YouTube is not usually deemed a reliable source, and the content is arguably promotional. Perhaps I'm wrong about these things. Discuss! Thanks. JohnInDC (talk) 17:31, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]