Talk:Museum of Osteology
Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
Notability etc
[edit]This article seems like a fluffy piece, about a non-notable museum run by a company with a similar adverty tone. It hasn't even opened yet! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 16:54, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
I disagree that this is a "non-notable" museum. I am interested in science and nature, osteology in particular, and I think there are many others like me that would like to know more about this museum. If anyone would like to expand on the "fluff" I contributed, I welcome it. Sklmsta (talk) 15:48, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
- I recommend that you read Wikipedia's notability guideling as well as the verifiability,reliable sources and conflict of interest guidelines. As the article stands at the moment it is likely to be deleted. - Nick Thorne talk 22:32, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
References
[edit]The references used are not properly cited. Instead they all Wiki-links. This does not meet Wikipedia's verifiability requirements as Wikipedia pages are not considered to be reliable sources. - Nick Thorne talk 22:32, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
All references are now cited. I propose removing the tag. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.200.200.26 (talk) 14:43, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
- The article is not tagged for lack of references, it is tagged for conflict of interest and notability, these issues have not been addressed, so it is inappropriate for either of the tags to be removed. - Nick Thorne talk 22:19, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
COI tag (December 2022)
[edit]At least one, and possibly more than one account that have contributed to this article appear to have a personal or professional relationship with the museum. Archer1234 (talk) 18:40, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
- C-Class Museums articles
- Low-importance Museums articles
- C-Class Death articles
- Low-importance Death articles
- C-Class Anatomy articles
- Low-importance Anatomy articles
- Anatomy articles about the field of anatomy
- WikiProject Anatomy articles
- C-Class Oklahoma articles
- Low-importance Oklahoma articles
- Articles edited by connected contributors