Talk:Muntz Street
Appearance
Muntz Street has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]- This review is transcluded from Talk:Muntz Street/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
- GA review (see here for criteria)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- I made a minor copyedit; otherwise all good.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Congratulations with a good article. Arsenikk (talk) 21:16, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Muntz Street. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.solihullac.co.uk/Pages/History.aspx - Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mapseeker.co.uk/major-british-cities/birmingham/?id=464&mapcode=J064&areaA=a4&areaB=b2
- Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/5p24VtZAo?url=http://www.mapseeker.co.uk/major-british-cities/birmingham/?id=464&mapcode=J064&areaA=a4&areaB=b2 to http://www.mapseeker.co.uk/major-british-cities/birmingham/?id=464&mapcode=J064&areaA=a4&areaB=b2
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:19, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Sports and recreation good articles
- Old requests for peer review
- GA-Class football articles
- Low-importance football articles
- GA-Class football in England articles
- Low-importance football in England articles
- Football in England task force articles
- WikiProject Football articles
- GA-Class West Midlands articles
- Low-importance West Midlands articles
- WikiProject West Midlands