Jump to content

Talk:Munich massacre

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Munich Massacre)
Former good article nomineeMunich massacre was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 14, 2006Good article nomineeNot listed
July 19, 2011Good article nomineeNot listed
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on September 5, 2005, September 5, 2006, September 5, 2007, September 5, 2008, September 5, 2009, September 5, 2010, and September 5, 2011.
Current status: Former good article nominee



[edit]

If someone could please change the link from Black September to Black September Organization in Aftermath, third paragraph.186.139.187.134 (talk) 16:45, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed the first mention of Black September in that section to a link to the correct article, and removed the later link. (Hohum @) 17:56, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 15 August 2024

[edit]

In the "Aftermath" section, it is stated that Carmel Eliash died of a heart attack during the memorial service in the Olympic Stadium, which is not correct. He suffered a heart attack but was flown to Israel and recovered. He died of another heart attack in May 1973. See the Wikipedia article about Carmel Eliash. Thank you. Jacqueshobbes (talk) 06:24, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done for now: There are no references in the Wikipedia article about it. If you have a reliable source to back this up, please link it in the reply and I will update the article.— BerryForPerpetuity (talk) 13:20, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 4 September 2024

[edit]

They were terrorists not militants 86.169.230.76 (talk) 20:50, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Bunnypranav (talk) 14:51, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

the terrorists did not demand the release of Andreas Baader of RAF in their communiqué

[edit]

As shown by Anna Greithanner, Dominik Aufleger and Robert Wolff in 2022 when they found a copy of the original communiqué in the Bavarian State Archives the terrorists of Black September did not demand the release of Andreas Baader but only of Ulrike Meinhof. Their article as showed that the formerly published number of to be released prisoners of about 236 was wrong since the list includes the names of 328. Thus the article should correct this mistake by removing Andreas Baader and including a section about common micsonceptions regarding the demands of Black September.

Link to the original german article: https://zeitgeschichte-online.de/kommentar/andreas-baader-ulrike-meinhof-und-hunderte-palaestinenserinnen and link to a (official) website including an upload of the original demands: https://www.erinnerungsort-fuerstenfeldbruck1972.de/en/police-operation-de 2003:102:B701:ED00:5534:EF4:F44F:E655 (talk) 16:35, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Corrections made to show the "original communiqué" cited does in fact only list the name of Ulrike Meinhof and not that of Andreas Baader, plus add inline citation/reference. Nightsturm (talk) 21:41, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

grammatical errors

[edit]

Ultimatum section: "Shortly before 5:00 am, the Munich police, the organizing committee, and paramedics were alerted. Ambulances arrived, and the blood-soaked Weinberg that the terrorists had thrown in front of the apartment building entrance (Connollystraße 31), who could not be saved, was recovered." This is poorly written overall but at a minimum change 'that' to who, in reference to a person.

News wire section: "Initial news reports published all over the world, indicated that all the hostages were alive and that all the attackers had been killed." This is not a grammatical sentence and is confusing as written. Most easily corrected with a comma after 'reports'. 2601:445:801:6F30:6168:FC43:BB71:8DA9 (talk) 07:20, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Engvar

[edit]

The article appears to have started in UK English ("armoured") and to now be a mixture of spellings. I propose to standardise it on the original version, per MOS:RETAIN. Any objections? John (talk) 08:01, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good to me. CWenger (^@) 16:54, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think I'm done. There is still a lot of repetition in the article, and the section on Anton Fliegerbauer should probably either be a standalone article, or should be removed. John (talk) 21:57, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've just seen Talk:Munich massacre/Archive 4#Merger proposal. It seems this material was merged here a couple of yeas ago. Would we favour recreating it as an article, or removing it? Some of it is duplicative and most of the rest probably fails WP:NOTMEMORIAL. What do folks think? John (talk) 23:29, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]