Talk:Muir Commons

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Karah26. Peer reviewers: Mkihiro, Cmpaz.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:35, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[Untitled]

My name is Kara and I plan on adding to this article stub to fill in more content.Karah26 (talk) 17:28, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Everything in the article is relevant to the article topic and there was nothing really that distracted me. The tone of the article is neutral and there are no claims that are based on a position. I feel like an image of either the layouts of the Muir Commons would be helpful. In the "Design History" in the last sentence I do not know what you mean by phase one in regards to the completion of the layout. In the "Community Characteristics" section I like that there are multiple features presented but they could flow a little better in the "Design Framework" section. The layout overall is clear and the citations are all accessible. There are multiple citations that are re-used. There could possibly be more sources to look into to expand on ideas. Possibly an update on what the Muir Commons looks like today if possible.Cmpaz (talk) 17:52, 4 May 2017 (UTC) Cmpaz[reply]