Talk:Mudeford Lifeboat Station

	Mudeford Lifeboat Station is within the scope of the WikiProject Water sports, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Water sports. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Water sportsWikipedia:WikiProject Water sportsTemplate:WikiProject Water sportsWater sports articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the RNLI task force.

Dorset Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dorset, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics connected with Dorset. If you would like to participate, you can visit the WikiProject Dorset project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.DorsetWikipedia:WikiProject DorsetTemplate:WikiProject DorsetDorset articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mudeford Lifeboat Station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140313061538/http://rnli.org/aboutus/lifeboatsandstations/stations/Pages/Visiting-stations.aspx to http://rnli.org/aboutus/lifeboatsandstations/stations/Pages/Visiting-stations.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:26, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting lifeboat tables

@Ojsyork: can you explain what is so terrible about my editing that causes you to revert so much of my work? A sortable table has got to be better than an unsortable one with so many variables. I left it so that people can chose to see in date order, by Op. No., or with the different classes grouped together. And a column headed "class" doesn't need the word "class" in every cell. Geof Sheppard (talk) 16:04, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is not the place to reply.

I shall send to your talk page.

MartinOjsyork (talk) 16:43, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure that your long reply on my talk page has answered my question about why my sortable table is worse than the fixed table that I replaced and has been restored. The reply is

Why do we need sortable tables? You do it when there are only 2 entries??

However the table in this article has 12 rows. Geof Sheppard (talk) 13:01, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]