This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Atheism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of atheism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AtheismWikipedia:WikiProject AtheismTemplate:WikiProject AtheismAtheism articles
Add Atheism info box to all atheism related talk pages (use {{WikiProject Atheism}} or see info box)
Ensure atheism-related articles are members of Atheism by checking whether [[Category:Atheism]] has been added to atheism-related articles – and, where it hasn't, adding it.
Try to expand stubs. Ideas and theories about life, however, are prone to generating neologisms, so some stubs may be suitable for deletion (see deletion process).
State atheism needs a reassessment of its Importance level, as it has little to do with atheism and is instead an article about anti-theist/anti-religious actions of governments.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nigeria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Nigeria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NigeriaWikipedia:WikiProject NigeriaTemplate:WikiProject NigeriaNigeria articles
Hi @Louis P. Boog, here's why I reverted your recent changes:
I don't think the short description requires more detail than "activist", as it is meant to be succinct, and the word "humanist" is rather ambiguous, at least to casual readers.
I don't think "Psychiatric hospital internment" is a good section header when the content doesn't exclusively focus on his internment.
I don't find "Mubarak Muhammad Bala is from a highly respected family, descended from generations of Islamic scholars" to be a very encyclopedic statement, and I also don't think it's highly relevant to the article topic.
@Revirvlkodlaku "Nigerian humanist activist" is well less than 40 characters. How can you be concerned about "humanist activist" being ambiguous but not simply"activist"?? Activist for what? Trade unions? Islamic revival? historic preservation? Louis P. Boog (talk) 02:34, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
ambiguousness of humanism: "Starting in the 20th century, humanist movements have typically been non-religious and aligned with secularism." Maybe if Bala was a "humanist scholar" it might be ambiguous, but activism is pretty much by definition contemporary. Louis P. Boog (talk) 03:27, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Revirvlkodlaku "from a highly respected family, descended from generations of Islamic scholars" is a quote from the New York Times, the "newspaper of record" in the USA. so a pretty WP:RS.
As for the relevance, it would explain their great interest in and possibly the influence to put Bala in a psychiatric hospital. It would help explain the notability of the whole tragedy for Kano, for the Nigerian Islamic community., and to some extent maybe the humanist community as a prestigious convert. Louis P. Boog (talk) 02:46, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not strongly opposed to the inclusion of "humanist" in the sd, I just think it's unnecessary. The sd is primarily intended to disambiguate, and I think "Nigerian activist" does the trick.
Yes WP:SDESC does say "short descriptions are not intended to define the subject of the article, but rather to distinguish it from other similarly named articles in search results," but if you can give a better description with only a total of three words (26 characters by my count), why not?
