This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
@Onel5969: Your repeated restoration of the tag is discourteous, and falls afoul of WP:BRD. While I may not formally be a NPP reviewer, I'm an editor of 10+ years tenure, 20000+ edits, and know the policies by heart. I have reviewed the sources, found them adequate, and removed the tag accordingly, with a request that the article gets AfD-ed should anyone disagree with my analysis. I don't care about having the NPP reviewer badge, but you should either check the sources yourself or trust other people's judgment, not edit-war to keep the apparent WP:DRIVEBY tag in. No such user (talk) 15:26, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And your continued removal of the tag actually violates WP:3RR. And is actually more discourteous since you have done it more times. As I said on your talk page, the tag is there to assist NPPers in reviewing the page. I did look at the sources, and it is borderline notability. And your unfounded accusations are even more discourteous. And you want to get into tenure and # of edits? I don't think you want to go there. Regardless, another reviewer might see it differently than I do, but the other point of leaving the tag is that it might encourage other editors of adding further sourcing. Onel5969TT me15:31, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
WP:WTRMT does not support your request that the tag is there to assist other reviewers who take a look at the article. It is a textbook WP:DRIVEBY tag; every single sentence of this short article is supported by an apparently reliable source, at least several apparently passing the RS bar. And notability is best tested on AfD. No such user (talk) 15:36, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You managed to do all that analysis in 3 minutes, between taggingNelpettai (which took you less than a minute to analyze sources [1]) and tagging this article? While I find that hard to believe, I must congratulate you for the astonishing speed of curation. No such user (talk) 09:22, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I already moved this article to draft twice but other editors kept moving it back, so here we are. We should discuss the sources here and see if they meet WP:GNG and whether it is significant coverage. I don't believe this needs an immediate AFD. My concern was that the sources are all localized, and "The New Hue" isn't a RS website. However, ABS-CBN is promising that they gave the artist a news interview segment. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:52, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I was the one who started the discussion, but never mind. While I don't mind it tagged once, edit-warring to keep the tag in without providing a talk page rationale is obnoxious. On to the topic: I'm not personally familiar with Philippine press, but apart from ABC-CBN, Manilla Bulletin and PhilStar are both described in our articles as major media in the country, and they have substantial pieces about the singer. The very fact that she was featured on Times Square[2] – however she got there – strongly suggests that we have a rising pop star, not a vanity article. Thus, I don't see a point of requiring more sources when the existing ones adequately support the little content we currently have and demonstrate notability. No such user (talk) 09:13, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
