Talk:Mount Pilchuck
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Photo added
[edit]Per request, I added a photo from the top of Pilchuck I took a few years ago. It would be better to have a photo of of the mountain rather than from its summit. But I thought I'd add this one for now. If anyone has a photo of the mountain, please replace! Pfly 04:04, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Mount Pilchuck/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Most similarly small mountains in the Cascades would rank low importance, but I figured this might make it to mid for a couple reasons. First, it's got more history than most, being the site of a fire lookout and also long ago, a ski resort with a lift and everything. Second, and more importantly, Pilchuck is the dominant peak on the horizon from many areas between Seattle and Mount Vernon (especially Everett and Marysville) because it is so far west and so distinct from its neighbors. W.stanovsky (talk) 23:40, 6 October 2009 (UTC) |
Last edited at 23:40, 6 October 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 00:31, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Mountain article has no geology section
[edit]I guess the header says it all. Surely its geology is no mystery?-- Quisqualis (talk) 15:38, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Stub-Class Mountain articles
- Mid-importance Mountain articles
- All WikiProject Mountains pages
- Stub-Class United States articles
- Mid-importance United States articles
- Stub-Class United States articles of Mid-importance
- Stub-Class Washington articles
- Mid-importance Washington articles
- WikiProject Washington articles
- WikiProject United States articles