Talk:Motion Picture Patents Company

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film: Filmmaking

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Filmmaking task force.

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

This article was the subject of an educational assignment that ended on 30 June 2013. Further details are available here.

General Film Corporation

I acknowledge that much more needs to be added about the MPPC's distribution monopoly, the General Film Corporation. — Walloon (talk) 07:56, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actor credits

The article currently reads:

Also, casts were kept uncredited on screen; studios, and Edison in particular, were concerned that creating individual stars would drive up the players' salaries. Instead, the studios relied on an in-house stock acting company, and marketed the product based on their own brand. For example, when Biograph Studios' leading actress (Florence Lawrence) proved popular with audiences, the studio began advertising pictures as featuring "The Biograph Girl."

Certainly there was initial resistance by the studios to giving actor credits and star publicity. But all of that changed during the life of the MPPC. Florence Lawrence and Florence Turner both became stars publicized under their own names in early 1910. By 1912, all the American members of the MPPC were giving cast lists in their films except Biograph, which relented the following year. There was no official prohibition in the MPPC against giving actor credits, and little evidence that non-MPPC studios had any interest in promoting stars either. — Walloon (talk) 17:26, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Translation Class Project

We are currently working on THE TRANSLATION into Spanish of this article. Translation work will be ready by the end of May 2013. For more information see Wikipedia:School_and_university_projects/Universitat_Jaume_I_-_E-translating PLEASE, DO NOT TRANSLATE THIS PAGE. IF YOU DO SO, PLEASE INFORM US AT Mcptrad -- Mcptrad (talk)

Filmmaking patents issue

It really feels left out that this article does not name exactly which companies would not pay their licensing fees to Edison to make movies. This part of the article is good "Many independent filmmakers, who controlled from one-quarter to one-third of the domestic marketplace, responded to the creation of the MPPC by moving their operations to Hollywood," but who exactly were these independent filmakers? I know IMP/Universal was one of them but who else? Neither this article or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cinema_of_the_United_States#Rise_of_Hollywood or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hollywood#Motion_picture_industry mentions exactly which companies moved to Hollywood for the specific reason to escape MPPC. I can look up the movie companies wiki page and see when they moved but there is no way to tell who did and didnt pay their MPPC fees because moving to Hollywood doesn't necessarily mean that they didn't pay. I think this is a crucial and important bit of information to have on this page. When it is left vague like how it is and doesn't name the companies then how can you even fact check that it is correct. It needs to name which companies did not pay. Lenneth (talk) 13:36, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]