Jump to content

Talk:Moral theology of Rowan Williams

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Is this article necessary?

[edit]

What is the point of this article? An article on Rowan Williams' views on sexuality, or specifically on homosexuality, might be worth including (I don't know how Wikipedia guidelines on notability would relate to such a proposal), but is it really worth having a page on a single lecture, most of which was not actually about the topic highlighted in this article (i.e., homosexuality)? Perhaps the problem is that the article is simply mis-named: the majority of the content is not actually about the lecture, after all.

--mahigton (talk) 22:33, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's more of an essay than a lecture, and it has actually been published as a book, which is available at Amazon.com. [1] The essay has been very important in the overall debate about Anglicanism and homosexuality and has been repeatedly cited both by opponents and defenders of homosexuality in the Anglican communion. Williams himself has also frequently mentioned the book when explaining his general perspective within the Anglican crisis. ADM (talk) 23:23, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
As it stands, only the first two subsections of the article refer to 'The Body's Grace', and they only refer to a small part of the lecture. The remaining seven sections of the article refer more generally to RW's views on homosexuality. So, as I say, this might make sense as an article on RW's views on homosexuality more generally - it isn't really an article specifically on 'The Body's Grace'. The article should be renamed. --mahigton (talk) 11:18, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Moral theology of Rowan Williams. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:38, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Moral theology of Rowan Williams. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:57, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]