Talk:Mor Chhainha Bhuinya

Removal of poor sources

Hi @Bonadart, I removed those sources because I found better sources that talk about the film's significance (TOI and a book, Reel India). See also my Keep !vote at the AfD. S0091 (talk) 17:24, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

hi @S0091 (talk) thanks for the keep vote, the reason i kept the sources is that when the film was released the film got practically no coverage as none believed in the film let alone be successful. The cultural significance of the film is huge such that it gave birth to an entire industry and helped all actors make debut including anuj sharma. The local media still doesnt profile Chhollywood (youtube not accepted here), after 25 yrs its not industry or films any fault. But still people go in hordes to watch these movies. problem is there are too few source, so whatever source can be added adds weight. i say this bcoz main reason given for delete is virtually no coverage let alone notability. i hope you understand my point. Bonadart (talk) 17:42, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

I just told you I found sources that do cover the history of the Chhattisgarhi film industry and the role of Mor Chhainha Bhuinya which I added to the article. Please review them. There is no need for blogs, which are not reliable sources, when there are better sources that support the same content. S0091 (talk) 17:47, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

hi i also said thanks and gave my reason for adding such sources, as they say 'something better than nothing' Bonadart (talk) 17:50, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

Yes, sorry, I understand why you used them but they are no longer needed. S0091 (talk) 17:52, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

S0091 (talk) btw as for Mor Chhainha Bhuinya 3 the only mention is via a IG post by the director. that is why i think should be kept as no mention anywhere else Bonadart (talk) 17:49, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

Social media is not a reliable source (and one the worst sources) so should not be used. If there are no better sources, especially since it is a more current event (we aren't talking about something from back in early 2000s) that means it is not noteworthy so should not be included. S0091 (talk) 17:55, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

hi @:S0091 (talk) thanks you seem to be a reasonable person, its seems you also know about Chhollywood. i saw that director Satish Jain had a huge page unto himself yet it was deleted, any idea why, can it be revived, your honest opinion Bonadart (talk) 18:42, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

I try to be reasonable. :) I know nothing about Chhollywood or Chhattisgarh. In fact I didn't know either existed until I came across the AfD, then looked at the article and thought it was likely notable so set out to find sources. Do you know what the exact title for article that existed about Satish Jain? Right now I get Satish Jain. Also, are you able to access the book I added (footnote #2)? It has some info about Jain. S0091 (talk) 18:56, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

hi it is this one https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Satish_Jain_(director) reason given unsourced!! Bonadart (talk) 19:27, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

Oh, ok. It's a draft, not an article that was deleted. All of the content about him is unsourced. The only thing sourced is the Filmography. You didn't answer my other question about access to the book. S0091 (talk) 19:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

And since the discussion has moved away from a discussion about this article to about Jain, I suggest starting a discussion at Draft:Satish Jain (director). You can ping me there. S0091 (talk) 19:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

hi i can i included satish jain here bcoz he is the director of the film Bonadart (talk) 19:43, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

Oh yeah, he should be included in this article but if you want to discuss the draft, then we should discuss it on the draft's talk page rather than here. S0091 (talk) 19:45, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

will do not now sometime next week Bonadart (talk) 20:41, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

• @Bonadart: @S0091: sources that are blogs, or something like Anuj Sharma website need to be cleanup and replaced with reliable sources where needed. RangersRus (talk) 13:08, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

  Hi its true but what to do when there are no such so called reliable sources since the industry as a whole isnt profiled in local media. as such any source that is available should be used and replaced only when such sources are available. thats my opinion. Bonadart (talk) 16:07, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

  Unreliable sources are removed per Wikipedia policy and guidelines and no where it says that the unreliable sources can be kept till reliable sources become available. RangersRus (talk) 19:48, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Removal of India Today

Hi @CNMall41, the source is only being used to support it was Sharma's debut film, not to support notability or a contentious claim. It is also supported by his website which falls under WP:ABOUTSELF. Unless you have reason to believe to statement is not true, I don't see an issue with using it. S0091 (talk) 19:01, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

I understand. I didn't remove the content, only the source, as it is likely true, but still need a reliable source for V. A CN tag would probably be appropriate but we wind up have these added over and over and then a page full of them. I am not sure I have seen support for their use at all. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:09, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

It meets WP:V as does his website. Per WP:SELFPUB Self-published and questionable sources may be used as sources of information about themselves (bolding in the policy). I can change to his site or add both. S0091 (talk) 19:17, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

And to be honest, I really don't care if you add it back later. If this is kept, as it likely will be, I will be removing from my watchlist. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:16, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

No offense but if you won't care later then I am not sure why you care now. I get WP:NEWSORGINDIA so certainly would not the source to support notability or an extraordinary claim but this is, to me, innocuous. S0091 (talk) 19:38, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

None taken. It is in the middle of a deletion discussion so I am caring now to ensure unreliable sources are not added. His website may meet SELFBUB (and I wouldn't argue if you added it), but India Today is still unreliable per NEWSORGINDIA and it is not SELFPUB. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:50, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

I still disagree about using India Today for this specific claim so will take that to RSN to get additional input (how far does WP:NEWSORGINDIA go?). In the interim, I will add his website and make an adjustment to the sentence because it doesn't support "Every actor". S0091 (talk) 20:00, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

hi but it is a fact that every actor msade his or her debut with the film Bonadart (talk) 07:10, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

I think that is a good idea. If you an ping me when you do as clarification would be helpful. There have also been concerns about the overall use of the term "INDIA" in the title (which I have as well) as it paints a negative for a region. Thinking maybe we need to change it to something else for clarification since it deals with all media in the region and not just a specific country. Your thoughts on that would be appreciated as well. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:11, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

I will of course ping you (about to go out of town so it will be a bit) and I totally agree it needs to be expanded to other regions but I think they are separate discussions. Maybe we can workshop something together for the broader question. Some research into previous discussions and examples are needed. S0091 (talk) 20:25, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Okay then, you worry about yourself and the weekend and in the meantime I will pull some info on previous discussions as well as those who have objected to the name. Will send you the link to draftspace and we can run it up the flagpole when you get back. Cheers!--CNMall41 (talk) 20:40, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

hi CNMall41 (talk)

every opinion matters yours too, point is if you are willing to head to others opinion, the way i see what n how are not issue anymore, its why here, i think its decided that the film is of high importance thanks to being critical n commercial success n giving birth to a new film industry, so the sources being added give weight or not matters, S0091 (talk) i think any source that does is good to go. Bonadart (talk) 07:23, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know my opinion matters but that is not true. Guidelines and policies matter. Fact is this is full of unreliable sources. The other issues above will be addressed at WP:RSN where you are welcome to discuss your views as well. As I said before, I am unwatching this page. I am starting on the second to remove the unreliable sources so hopefully you can see what is and isn't acceptable. --CNMall41 (talk) 00:03, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for 'Keep' Vote

Hi Thanks to Mushy Yank(talk), Atlantic306 (talk), Tushar3011 (talk), DareshMohan (talk), and S0091 (talk) for the 'keep' vote. I know this may not have been done before, but this is important as many people have been trying to create this page for past several years but everytime it was getting rejected or deleted. Finally my version has found a place and despite efforts to remove it, thanks to your keep vote the page has remained and hopefully it stays the same for ever from now. Hope this page is further improved. Thanks ya'll. Bonadart (talk)

Removal of Gurturgoth

S0091 (talk) it is clearly visible at the top that anirudh dubey while the film was being made did a long interview with director satish jain for evening daily 'highway channel' (a known evening daily) which is now shut. later the very same article in its entirity was posted by anirudh dubey on his facebook page. after that, this article/interview has been retrieved from his facebook and republished on gurturgoth. gurturgoth looks to be very much reliable. as such i request to restore it as a source. Bonadart (talk) 03:55, 5 October 2024 (UTC)