Jump to content

Talk:Monica Raymund

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Vandalims

[edit]

To IP: 66.231.145.61 please don't vandalize by reverting. the site provided is to the article and was provided so that we know exactly what's in the article, i.e., that we don't have someone say that it's a quote when it isn't. --RossF18 (talk) 02:32, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

These strange quotation marks

[edit]

These strange quotation marks need to go. They are totally unencyclopedic and the only thing they convey is that the author somehow doubts their content. If we doubt content we should not put it in a BLP. I intend to remove them. If you think I shouldn't, please explain their purpose. Wefa (talk) 23:09, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quotation marks denote exact phrazing from the source, not that the "author somehow doubts their content." Please refer to the meaning of quotations in the citation manuals. Quotations denote direct cites as opposed to paraphrazing. The other meaning of quotations you're referring to does not apply here per the context of the sentence. I would oppose any removal of citations as their removal would make this less encyclopedic, not more. Now, as far as paraphrazing is concenred, that's another issue. --RossF18 (talk) 16:38, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
But the fact that the exact phrasing is used and attributed denotes that the author distances himself from the content. The only situation where this is appropriate where it is meant to illustrate a third party's opinion - not encyclopedic fact. This is not a scientific article. Wefa (talk) 18:06, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

broadway theatre project

[edit]

I'm still learning how to edit a page itself. Can someone help me by including that she is now on the faculty of the Broadway Theatre Project? (broadwaytheatreproject.com is a reference) Neilisyours (talk) 19:47, 1 March 2011 (UTC)neil[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Monica Raymund. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:02, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dating

[edit]

I thought Wikipedia biography articles did not list who people were dating? Why does this article? -- 109.78.204.3 (talk) 21:57, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

jesse spencer kara killmer wedding today

[edit]

jesse spencer kara killmer weddung today 99.252.170.47 (talk) 20:22, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]