Talk:Mondeghili
Appearance
A fact from Mondeghili appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 October 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article contains a translation of Mondeghili from it.wikipedia. |
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:10, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the mondeghili (pictured) spread during the Spanish domination in the Duchy of Milan? Source: "...e al tempo stesso principale eredità culinaria degli Spagnoli. Furono loro a diffonderli nel secolo e mezzo in cui dominarono la città, tra il 1535 e il 1706:" ([1])
- ALT1:... that the mondeghili (pictured) are mentioned in the novel The Betrothed by Alessandro Manzoni? Source: "...i mondeghili figurano nei Promessi Sposi, al capitolo VII." ([2])
- ALT2:... that the mondeghili (pictured) can be served either as appetizer or as main course? Source: "A Milano, c’è chi le ordina come antipasto e chi le preferisce come secondo piatto..." ([3])
- Reviewed: Racism-Turanism trials
Created by Alessandro57 (talk). Self-nominated at 14:54, 11 September 2021 (UTC).
- Comment only Things I learned about the 16th century today. This dish "was in fact born from the need not to waste leftovers from the abundant holiday dinners and lunches." Victuallers (talk) 17:37, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- I checked, and this sentence is unsourced. I removed it, since it is unlikely that in the 16th century the Lombards were so rich that they could often afford beef. Alex2006 (talk) 17:39, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
- I'm guessing that. It still says "born from the need not to waste leftovers cuts of beef". The word "born" is journalist talk and not needed here. Victuallers (talk) 09:22, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
- I substituted "was born" with "resulted". Is it ok? Please feel free to copyedit the article, which is partly a translation from an Italian article with Italian sources and has been translated by an Italian speaking guy. :-) Alex2006 (talk) 11:19, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
- Full review needed; as "mondeghili" is not a proper noun, I have lowercased it in the proposed hooks. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:03, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
- Hallo @BlueMoonset: this article has been copyedited a couple of days ago. What else needs to be done? Cheers, Alex2006 (talk) 09:19, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
- Alex2006, that will be up to the reviewer to determine. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:46, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image eligibility:
- Freely licensed: - I'm not quite sure? The tags aren't quite clear.
- Used in article:
- Clear at 100px:
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Everything (except the image, that needs clearing up) looks good, nice work! ALT0 is approved (ALTs 1 and 2 aren't quite interesting), but I'd like to suggest an ALT3:
- ALT3: That Cooking For Weak Stomachs recommends that mondeghili (pictured) not be eaten at the osteria?
- someone else will need to approve it. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 02:07, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
T:DYK/P7 with ALT0