Talk:Model (art)

	; Archives (Index) ;
	1;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Model (art) was nominated as a Art and architecture good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (October 20, 2024, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Model (art) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Nudity Mid‑importance

	Nudity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nudity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of nudity and naturism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NudityWikipedia:WikiProject NudityTemplate:WikiProject Nuditynudity articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Reorganization

To expand upon the three types of work cited in the lead, I have renamed and added sections to organize new content cited from the CUNY doctoral thesis and another from the University of Sydney. Both are book-length so it may take some time. Rather than a preparing a long draft and dropping it in, I am adding new content incrementally.--WriterArtistDC (talk) 15:44, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also moving previous content.--WriterArtistDC (talk) 22:07, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

2009-08-31-akt-muehle-001.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:38, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

2009-08-31-akt-muehle-047.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:06, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:23, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To demonstrate the WP is not a democracy, the files were deleted by an administrator who agreed with the nominator, while the majority of participants in the discussion said Keep. Yet I often see images on Commons with the same issue, personality rights, but rather than being deleted they are tagged with a template warning potential users.--WriterArtistDC (talk) 13:09, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Model (art)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: WriterArtistDC (talk · contribs) 02:47, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: IntentionallyDense (talk · contribs) 19:54, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Failed good article nomination on October 20, 2024

Upon its review on October 20, 2024, this good article nomination was quick-failed because:

it contains cleanup banners including, but not limited to, {{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}}, etc, or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar inline tags that are still valid,

thus making it ineligible for good article consideration.

This article did not receive a thorough review, and may not meet other parts of the good article criteria. I encourage you to remedy this problem (and any others) and resubmit it for consideration. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a Good article reassessment. Thank you for your work so far. --IntentionallyDense (talk) 19:54, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I have fixed all but four of the cn tags, and will resubmit it soon. WriterArtistDC (talk) 03:41, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The topic does look really interesting so I'm glad youre choosing to fix it up! IntentionallyDense (talk) 03:51, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]