Talk:Missing stair

Linguistics Low‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Languages Low‑importance

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sociology Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Perhaps this shouldn't be a Wikipedia article

Frankly, this does not seem notable enough to be on Wikipedia, and this page probably violates WP:NOTDICT. However, due to my strong and idiosyncratic personal convictions, I refuse to delete Wikipedia pages for these reasons, so I just note it here to feel like I've done something. Make of this what you will. Dingolover6969 (talk) 11:02, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article is a lot more than just a dictionary entry though. —ajf (talk) 12:35, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Respectfully, I have to disagree; the sections of this article are, at time of writing: intro, origins, meaning, usage, see also, & references. Leaving aside intro, see also, & references, the remaining sections are the coining of the phrase, its meaning, and examples of it being used. This is well within the purview of a dictionary and not particularly within the purview of a Wikipedia article unless the term is otherwise notable for some reason. But, ultimately this is a judgement call and you are free to have your own opinion. Dingolover6969 (talk) 13:13, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Photo caption is wrong

It says "A staircase with two missing stairs..." They're not missing at all. They're broken. That inaccuracy doesn't help the article at all. HiLo48 (talk) 00:28, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]