Talk:Mischief Reef

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mischief Reef article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

China Start‑class Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Taiwan Low‑importance

	Taiwan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taiwan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taiwan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TaiwanWikipedia:WikiProject TaiwanTemplate:WikiProject TaiwanTaiwan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tambayan Philippines Low‑importance

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Vietnam Low‑importance

	Vietnam portal This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A question

The name is quite fitting but where does it come from?

The currently supplied answer of it being the family name of a German seems idiotic to me. "Mischief" is not a German family name. The story about "Henry Spratly" and the date 1791 isn't attributed to what I would call a reliable source, either. William Avery (talk) 09:47, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@ William, I think it is more probable that the reef was named after the clipper ship Mischief, which often sailed between China and U.S.A in the 1850s. I am going through the abstract of her log, of 1854, when, under the command of W.E.Laurence, she made a voyage from Foo Chow Foo (China) to new York, via Anambas. This route would have take her through the Spratlys. At that time, it was common for reefs to be named after vessels that ran aground off them (and thus discovered them), like the Bombay reef. I will research some more, and make an edit only after I am sure. Notthebestusername (talk) 10:27, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Agree that the German name claim sounds really dubious. If his surname is "Mischief", then his middle name is also probably "Danger". --benlisquare_T•C•E 10:28, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks guys. The 1791 chronology is off beam too. I'll mark it as dubious for now. William Avery (talk) 10:40, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I think the name should be Richard Spratly. He and William (his brother) sailed together. I cannot see references to any person called Henry anywhere. Notthebestusername (talk) 02:13, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Removed it. 6 years as dubious should be enough to fix it if it wasn't.185.233.255.237 (talk) 12:17, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another question.

Why avoid the word "occupied" for islands that China has occupied? How many Wumao are editing and writing the pages to be favourable to China? When pages about other reefs like West London Reef are listed as being "occupied" by Vietnam. Why not use the same language for China?

Why does Vietnam get the negative connotation language terms, yet China's cases are glossed over and the page almost tries to imply that China is some peaceful non-occupying entity in the Spratly islands? I think Wikipedia needs to crack down on Wumao, who have clearly been writing and editing a lot of pages to be pro-CCP. 118.210.124.142 (talk) 23:06, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

you can complain about pro china comment, however "wumao" is a racist term. it has been use against other asian improperly and should not be use.2406:3003:2060:3135:DC01:5528:8C6B:D21A (talk) 14:21, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Very problematic map

The map in the current version of this article is extremely inadequate, giving no idea to the reader how close Mischief Reef is to either the Philippines or mainland China. Please fix! 98.123.38.211 (talk) 00:11, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

the PCA website link in the article is dead.

i include a new link for referrence, if anyone feel like cleaning up the article. https://pcacases.com/web/sendAttach/2086 2406:3003:2060:3135:DC01:5528:8C6B:D21A (talk) 14:19, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]