Talk:Mirrorball (song)

Mirrorball (song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 4, 2023. (Reviewed version).

Taylor Swift Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taylor Swift, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taylor Swift on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Taylor SwiftWikipedia:WikiProject Taylor SwiftTemplate:WikiProject Taylor SwiftTaylor Swift articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Roots music Low‑importance

	Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Roots music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to roots, folk and traditional folk music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Roots musicWikipedia:WikiProject Roots musicTemplate:WikiProject Roots musicRoots music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

GA Review

Passed. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 14:36, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Mirrorball (song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: BennyOnTheLoose (talk · contribs) 01:53, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a. (reference section):

b. (citations to reliable sources):

c. (OR):

d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a. (major aspects):

b. (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

Happy to discuss, or be challenged on, any of my comments. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 02:17, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio check

I reviewed all matches above 5% found using Earwig's Copyvio Detector. Only one issue: The phrase "solace on the dance floor" appears in the Vogue source and could be reworded or cited. (I'm not sure that WP:LIMITED will apply here)

Images

After a quick image search, I'm prepared to believe that there are no suitable free images that meet MOS:IMAGERELEVANCE.

Sources

The Facebook page of the Recording Industry Association of Malaysia is used as a source. IMO this is suitable here, in the spirit of WP:FACEBOOK, as it's only used to support the chart position in Malaysia.
What makes Boston University News Service a reliable source per WP:RSSM? (It looks like it could be omitted.)

Formatting

There are a couple of duplicate links: Slant Magazine and Billboard. (MOS:LINKONCE)
I ran a script to format dates, feel free to revert if you have any issue with that.

Production and release

It's not specifically mentioned here that "Mirrorball" was written and produced by Swift and Antonoff, although their credit as producers is in the Personnel section and doesn't need to be repeated.
Optionally, mention that Kitty Committee was a home studio at her Los Angeles residence. (I only know this from the Folklore (Taylor Swift album) article)

Music and lyrics

Spot check on "Jason Lipshutz from Billboard deemed it an indie folk track" - no issues.
Spot check on " "beardo" indie rock influence" - I'm not too sure about the "beardo" here, but it is what Wood wrote... if keeping it, maybe "beardo indie rock" should all be in quotation marks as the source has all of that phrase.
Spot check on "'Mirrorball' is a track that reflects her state of mind during the COVID-19 quarantine" - no issues.

Critical reception

For [5][11][22][23] , consider using WP:CITEBUNDLE
Spot check on Giselle Au-Nhien Nguyen "an album highlight" - not explicitly in the source, but seems a reasonable conclusion from the text.
Spot check on Mikael Wood rating it "the best album track" - no issues.
"Hannah Mylrea of NME not as impressed," - needs a slight tweak, e.g. "Hannah Mylrea of NME was not as impressed,"

Infobox and lead

Duration of 3:29 is not supported by a citation.

Commercial performance / Personnel / Charts

No issues.

Thanks for your work on the article, Ippantekina. I just have a few minor points above. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 13:50, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking up the review, BennyOnTheLoose. I have addressed everything accordingly. Cheers, Ippantekina (talk) 03:27, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Ippantekina. Just one last point - Jack Antonoff is mentioned as a co-writer of the song in the lead and infobox, but this isn't cited either in "Production and release" or "Personnel". Regards, 09:36, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That should be done now BennyOnTheLoose. :) Ippantekina (talk) 02:30, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.