Talk:Mir Masjidi Khan

Afghanistan Low‑importance

	Afghanistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Afghanistan, a project to maintain and expand Afghanistan-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AfghanistanWikipedia:WikiProject AfghanistanTemplate:WikiProject AfghanistanAfghanistan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Biography

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Edit conflict

Hi. There seems to be some problem, an edit conflict, and am not entirely clear why and what about? Could someone enlighten me pl? ThanksKhani100 (talk) 07:00, 19 April 2012 (UTC)Khani100[reply]

Hello, further to the above--have done some work on this article today and shall be doing more work over time, i.a., so it's a new and an ongoing project. The article is not an 'orphan' and it has a respectably-sized 'family', and collateral branches too : ) --and they shall link up in good time! This 'baby' was born today and you cant expect it to run before it can even walk, right? So, please bear with it; and me, thanks Khani100 (talk) 08:54, 19 April 2012 (UTC)Khani100[reply]

Ahhh, I see the root of your problem. :) I've also replied to your inquiery on my Talk page, feel free to check that out too. See the ARTICLE is an orphan, not the subject itself. Feel free to read through the explanation of what an edit conflict is, then I think you'll understand. You must have been trying to modify the page at the same time as someone else, (I guess me) they saved their changes, and then Wikipedia didn't know what to do with yours. All you have to do is figure out how to reapply your changes and merge them in with theirs. There are instructions both on the Edit Conflict page, and that screen that you saw. Jesse V. (talk) 15:45, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I like where this article is going. Sounds very encyclopedic already, keep up the good work and keep researching! I haven't checked to see if this is a problem, but just make sure that you're rephrasing your source in your own words, since a simply copy/paste is bad due to copyright issues and all that. But from what I've seen, it seems that things are going really well and it'll be good to see more! Jesse V. (talk) 15:50, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thanks for your reply--shall also check out your Talk Page directly and read up the info on the above links. Im sorry to be a bother, but fact is, while am keen on research etc, am not so good at the technical aspects of Wikipedia and possibly, some problems might arise out of this. But am learning, gradually. V best regs, Khani100 (talk) 04:54, 20 April 2012 (UTC)Khani100[reply]

Actually, I hadnt typed in that much info and have now added the later/updated version, as you see it, which is proceeding well, thank you. I hope to be able to make something good out of this in due course. Khani100 (talk) 04:57, 20 April 2012 (UTC)Khani100[reply]

Stay dedicated. Trust me, a truly encyclopedic article that you wrote is something to be proud of, because they take skill! Good luck to you, Jesse V. (talk) 05:09, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks ! Im v happy to be part of Wikipedia and am learning a lot from this collaborative effort, and hopefully shall in time be able to produce articles of good standard, Regs, Khani100 (talk) 05:25, 20 April 2012 (UTC)Khani100[reply]

Building up

Hi all. Am slowly building up this article, and would be grateful for some info-- if anyone knows where I can get a good photo (in line with Wikipedia/Wikimedia copyright standards and guidelines) would really like to have one, or more, thanks! Khani100 (talk) 05:25, 20 April 2012 (UTC)Khani100[reply]

Since this is a new article, I'm not sure that there are many active edits of this article besides yourself, and IMO at this point you're unlikely to get a reply here. I'd post on the Talk pages of the WikiProjects; there are probably a good amount of other editors there who would would be interested. Jesse V. (talk) 14:56, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mir Masjidi Khan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20120716091227/http://vvsaz.org/news/detail/?id=890 to http://vvsaz.org/news/detail/?id=890

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:48, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]