Talk:Minutes to Midnight (Linkin Park album)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Minutes to Midnight (Linkin Park album) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2 |
Minutes to Midnight (Linkin Park album) was a Music good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved. Favonian (talk) 11:44, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Minutes to Midnight (album) → Minutes To Midnight (album) – Currently, the title is Minutes to Midnight (album), but when reading the booklet that comes with the album, it is stylized as Minutes To Midnight with the "t" of "to" being capitalized. I know this is a minor change, but this is the capitalization that the band used in the booklet that came with the album. JDC808 (talk) 07:42, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose. MOS:CT does not make allowance for how the artist styled it; it says that to and other short prepositions should be lowercase. —C.Fred (talk) 23:54, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose. I agree with C.Fred. Wikipedia has clear style guidelines in this area. See also WP:MOSCAPS and WP:MOSTM. NoeticaTea? 00:10, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose per Noetica and C.Fred. Jenks24 (talk) 20:21, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Why does T and T redirect here?
[edit]I was looking for the old Mr. T tv show of that name...22:46, 14 August 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.226.133.186 (talk)
- Checking links to see which one points here. Try T&T for the dab page, which has an explanation for the link here and now has a link to T. and T.. —C.Fred (talk) 22:49, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- And retargeted T And T to the dab page. —C.Fred (talk) 22:50, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Genre
[edit]Maybe I'll say that I am fan of the ATS era of the band at the beginning. Honestly I don't understand why there is such a big deal with naming the record "pop rock". It is pretty obvious that there are pop rock songs on the album - In Between, Valentine's Day and Leave Out All The Rest. So why people are still changing it to alternative metal or nu metal? NU METAL? One reason, please. There is one metal song on the album - No More Sorrow - heavy guitar riff, marching percussion and screaming, no doubt about it. But it's just one song. Yeah, Given Up and Bleed It Out also contain heavy vocals, but the first in more punk/grunge with it's main riff, while the latter is a synthesis of rap rock and funk. Still, even if we count NMS, BIO and GU as metal songs, there are 3 metal songs and 3 pop rock songs on the record (the rest being alternative rock). So why can't we just agree with the fact that LP has recorded some of these on MTM and put the genre into the info-box? I know that there are some die-hard Hybrid Theory and Meteora fans out there who just can't accept that LP don't play nu metal anymore, but wikipedia shouldn't lie only because of that. Right now someone not knowing the band could think that Minutes... is just another Meteora-like record, and that's pretty unfair. Thank you and sorry for terrible english. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.24.88.94 (talk) 22:23, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
Redirection of "No More sorrow"
[edit]The rederection of the song "No More Sorrow" should be changed to the page No More Sorrow (Linkin Park) instead of this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chopra.nitin96 (talk • contribs) 04:24, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
- Absolutely not. The article name "No More Sorrow (Linkin Park)" will not replace "No More Sorrow" because almost every song on this website doesn't have the term "(Linkin Park song)" next to a song title unless if it's completely necessary. So therefore, it's not going to happen. I'm sorry. Skylar3214 (talk) 05:13, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Minutes to Midnight (Linkin Park album)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Article requirements: All the start class criteria |
Last edited at 20:34, 19 July 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 00:10, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Requested move 26 March 2017
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: PAGE MOVED.(non-admin closure) Kostas20142 (talk) 12:13, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Minutes to Midnight (album) → Minutes to Midnight (Linkin Park album) – Per WP:NCM, as Minutes to Midnight (Jon English album) exists. Possibly uncontrovertial but as LP's album is way popular and notable than JE's, a RM might be needed. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 06:27, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support Yeah I also don't see a problem here. InsertCleverPhraseHere 07:05, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support. The current title is incomplete disambiguation. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:26, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Removal of alternative metal?
[edit]Should alternative metal stay? There's no sourced genre in the infobox and there's only two songs there even close to metal, Given Up and No More Sorrow. I don't think it should stay as just alt rock though... Any other thoughts? --Solitude6nv5 (talk) 15:25, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
In that movie Inglourious Basterds they say there is a hand sign
[edit]Actually, within the Federal Republic of Germany the alphabetical numbering is considered a crime vs §130 StGB.
888 ist somewhere beyond Heil Hitler ( which is just 88 ) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A0A:A549:23BF:0:1985:31CA:BA8D:8F51 (talk) 11:34, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
"Linkin park 3" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]The redirect Linkin park 3 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 27 § Linkin park 3 until a consensus is reached. Sincerely, Key of G Minor. Tools: (talk, contribs) 17:22, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
- Former good article nominees
- C-Class Album articles
- WikiProject Albums articles
- C-Class Rock music articles
- High-importance Rock music articles
- WikiProject Rock music articles
- B-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- B-Class Linkin Park articles
- High-importance Linkin Park articles
- WikiProject Linkin Park articles