Jump to content

Talk:Minster Lovell Hall

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Minster Lovell Hall

[edit]

Today

[edit]
The ruins of Minster Lovell Jonah Noel [my emphasis] Hall are quite extensive. The most prominent feature are the Hall with its ornamented entrance porch and the south west tower.

I have deleted 'Jonah Noel'. Why should the Hall be called after a Jonah Noel? If somebody has information regarding this name, I'd be interested to know about it.

Ascelin Goel (talk) 18:57, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Minster Lovell Hall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:18, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Legend section

[edit]

The text rebutting the idea the legend surrounding the death of Francis Lovell, 1st Viscount Lovell could do with a source to support it. I am not saying it is wrong, as I know there are objections to the story and various theories regarding Lord Lovell's fate, but without a source it reads like original research. Also I am not sure if "Unfortunately, it seems unlikely this is the case" is the best way to phrase this. Dunarc (talk) 22:48, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]