Talk:Mine planter

Military history: Maritime / North America / United States / World War I / World War II C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War I task force
	World War II task force

Ships C‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Title

Used "(ship)" as this is a type of ship, contains listing of the individual ships and helps place the topic. That might not be the best description and perhaps needs changing. "Ship Type" perhaps? Palmeira (talk) 15:56, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

27-28 July 2013 moved to Mine planter (U.S. Army) after removal of Hashima-class cable layer from "See also" section. While a worldwide piece might be useful the focus here is on vessels of the U.S. Army Mine Planter Service (USAMPS) and its predecessor organization. Attempting to expand that into some sort of worldwide discussion or listing would, in my view, make for a cluttered and unfocused article. A section providing brief mention and links to analogous vessels in other services is of value and it could be expanded into a bullet list of such services even though only the one immediate case is now linked. If enough other cases and articles become available a worldwide category of something such as "Mine planting vessels" might be useful for association. Palmeira (talk) 13:17, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion

Just a quick suggestion, but the citations to websites could be formatted using the {{cite web}} template. This would tidy up the references and remove the long url chains that are currently showing. Also references to the same source can be consolidated per WP:NAMEDREFS. Cheers. — AustralianRupert (talk) 06:54, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, a better way. Palmeira (talk) 13:17, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Mine planter (U.S. Army). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:17, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mine planter (vessel). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20020203123127/http://patriot.net/~eastlnd2/Misc.htm to http://patriot.net/~eastlnd2/Misc.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:35, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]