Talk:Military-First Girls/GA1

GA Review

Passed. seefooddiet (talk) 02:29, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Yue (talk · contribs) 03:06, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Seefooddiet (talk · contribs) 05:17, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Notes

Hi, review again!

Article writing solid as with previous noms.
Verified refs 1, 2, 5, 6, and 7.
The article's current content seems comprehensive to me. It captures basically everything I can find in English. Littel coverage seems to exist in Korean; mostly translations from English-language articles. I feel like maybe there's possibly more info available in Japanese, although I've tried a Google News search and couldn't find much. Unless someone can find more Japanese-language info I think current info is fine.
No images of the band, but that's probably to be expected.
Is there a ref to support that they're still active? I think most recent attestation is a 2021 interview from that 2022 book.
- In the book, it says that they deleted their twitter. However there is this twitter account (not an RS) that I think probably belongs to them that hasn't been active since 2022.
- I asked the Wikipedia Discord and one person said we should just assume status quo (that the band is still operating) if we don't have a source saying they disbanded. I'm not sure what to do. What's your thoughts?

seefooddiet (talk) 05:17, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Seefooddiet: I'd reckon that not assuming the status quo without a reliable source would be akin to proving a negative without a basis for the proof. What we can interpret and cite from the book is that the Military-First Girls' Twitter account had been deleted by 2021/22. However, I don't think we can assume that the organisation disbanded; perhaps they just went offline as a consequence of the negative publicity. I think we should report what reliable sources state and omit assumptions, however likely or possible they may be, if they lack reliable sources to back them up. I'll add the sentence about the Twitter account being deleted, but aside from that I don't think anything else needs to be done. Yue🌙 08:44, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pass, great work as always 🙂 seefooddiet (talk) 02:28, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.