Talk:Migration (2023 film)/GA2

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Zingo156 (talk · contribs) 11:59, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Brachy0008 (talk · contribs) 04:19, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

hi! it’s brachy, back for another review (it’s been a while lol). anyways… better get out of the woods review as soon as possible ;D

Lead

• Box office, runtime and budget not in the body

The box office is in the body as is the budget (The latter is at the end of the first paragraph in the Development and writing section) Zingo156 (talk) 04:56, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

found the box office and the budget. No runtime in the body brachy08 _{(chat here lol)} 01:06, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

Added the running time at the end of the Theatrical section! Source is the Irish Film Classfication Office. Zingo156 (talk) 11:32, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

It just got undone... Most articles do not source run times unless the film is still playing in theaters anyways. Including good and featured ones. Zingo156 (talk) 16:22, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Copyvios

• Pretty concerningly high (62.5%)
  • FN 25 has the highest violation (42.5%), especially in the lead.
  • In summary, you might want to paraphrase the lead by a significant bit

That first source, the Deviantart page with a 97.0% similarity rating, copied and pasted Wikipedia, there is no denying that. But I would make a case that the second one, the When To Stream source with a 42.5% similarity, did so as well. That page was published on January 8, 2024 and this was the state of this Wikipedia page a couple of days earlier. The lead is the same. Zingo156 (talk) 05:09, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

The When to Stream page was actually published on January 17, so I think it is safe to say that they copied and pasted off the Wikipedia article's lead. Zingo156 (talk) 05:11, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

fair enough. brachy08 _{(chat here lol)} 10:00, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

Production and development

• FN 1 does not talk about Guylo Homsy
• FN 2 does not mention Patrick Imbert.
• FN 3 does not mention The Big Bad Fox and Other Tales...
• stating → stating that

Taken care of! Zingo156 (talk) 11:10, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

Last thing has been sorted! Zingo156 (talk) 09:04, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

Animation and design

• requires backgrounds to be fully visualized and rendered instead of suggested seems like a weird style of wording. (Try re-paraphrasing everything needed to be shown)
• FN 9 does not say anything about Meledandri requesting the clouds scene in Migration.
• Where does FN 15 say that Powell and Renner connected over their love of classical music? It only says that Renner is a huge classical music fan.

Done! Zingo156 (talk) 09:04, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

Release

• FN 21 does not contain stereoscopic.
• FN 19 does not talk about Ruby Gillman, Teenage Kraken.
• Is FN 23-4 reliable? Additionally, their names aren't formatted properly but that should be an easy fix.
• Is FN 26 reliable?
• FN 27-8 does not mention June 19, 2025

All dealt with! Zingo156 (talk) 06:51, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

Box office

• FN 14 and 17 are unreliable.

Film Music Reporter is unreliable? But it is used in so many good articles. Zingo156 (talk) 17:02, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

No I am pretty sure it is considered reliable. I found this 2023 discussion. Zingo156 (talk) 17:09, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

i’ll let this one slide. anyways, some points are left unaddressed but they should be easy fixes. anyways, the final point is well… source archives, but i’ll do it for you. brachy08 _{(chat here lol)} 23:30, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

@Zingo156 the points are still there… brachy08 _{(chat here lol)} 11:43, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

You mean in production and development, or everything you didn't cancel? Sorry for not answering quickly. Zingo156 (talk) 10:03, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

everything i didn't cancel brachy08 _{(chat here lol)} 10:06, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Critical response

• La Croix → La Croix's Stephane Dreyfus
• FN 39 does not mention anything about predictability.

Reworded the passage to better reflect the LA Times review article! Zingo156 (talk) 11:34, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

thanks... will pass brachy08 _{(chat here lol)} 01:19, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.