Talk:Migration (2023 film)

Migration (2023 film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 22, 2024	Good article nominee	Not listed
November 5, 2024	Good article nominee	Listed

Current status: Good article

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Migration (2023 film) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Animation: Films Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Animated films work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: American / Animated

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Animated films task force.

the film "migration" is about ducks not about pigeons

the film "migration" is about ducks not about felix(from stray kids)77.137.66.161 (talk) 11:17, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

David Mitchell character

Like a previous thread I made back for Rise of Gru, again the international dubbing confirmed the name for another charater; which is Googoo, the leader of the duck farm, set to be voiced by comedian Fran Hevia for the Latam market. Not adding it because confirmation is thru an instagram post and there is a posibility that the name could be adapted, Awkwafina's character Chump was translated to Pichón -Gouleg🛋️ ^harass/_hound (she/her) 15:30, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The little edit I keep putting in

Alright, alright. I’ll stop putting in the “unnecessary” edit. Dogperson160 (talk) 18:15, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What species are Kim's flock?

Not crucial but it might be interesting addition if someone knows. 2A00:23C8:B713:FD01:FC10:6D6C:D2EC:7AF4 (talk) 14:05, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've been trying to figure this out since the movie came out last year. As far as I can tell they're just some made up duck species, which is really odd considering the care with which they've represented all the other bird species in this movie. I wanted to add it to this article back in December 2023 but even according to the Audubon article on this movie they're just generic ducks, and I can't find any species of duck that remotely matches their appearance. Jaardon (talk) 07:53, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

Unsuccessful. All the Best! Otuọcha (talk) 23:59, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Migration (2023 film)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Zingo156 (talk · contribs)

Reviewer: Otuọcha (talk · contribs) 23:00, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's well writing such good article. For now, I am failing this article because if this concerns of copyright violations expressed [1] and [2]. I do wish it's been resubmitted if the case may be. For now, have significant case of prompt withdrawal. All the Best! Otuọcha (talk) 23:59, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.whentostream.com/news/digital-streaming-date-for-animated-adventure-migration-revealed https://www.christianpost.com/news/migration-animated-film-promises-laughs-wholesome-humor.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. All the Best! Otuọcha (talk) 23:54, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

Passed. brachy08 _{(chat here lol)} 01:20, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Migration (2023 film)/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Zingo156 (talk · contribs) 11:59, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Brachy0008 (talk · contribs) 04:19, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hi! it’s brachy, back for another review (it’s been a while lol). anyways… better get out of the ~~woods~~ review as soon as possible ;D

Lead

~~Box office, runtime and budget not in the body~~

The box office is in the body as is the budget (The latter is at the end of the first paragraph in the Development and writing section) Zingo156 (talk) 04:56, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

found the box office and the budget. No runtime in the body brachy08 _{(chat here lol)} 01:06, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Added the running time at the end of the Theatrical section! Source is the Irish Film Classfication Office. Zingo156 (talk) 11:32, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It just got undone... Most articles do not source run times unless the film is still playing in theaters anyways. Including good and featured ones. Zingo156 (talk) 16:22, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvios

~~Pretty concerningly high (62.5%)~~
- ~~FN 25 has the highest violation (42.5%), especially in the lead.~~
- ~~In summary, you might want to paraphrase the lead by a significant bit~~

That first source, the Deviantart page with a 97.0% similarity rating, copied and pasted Wikipedia, there is no denying that. But I would make a case that the second one, the When To Stream source with a 42.5% similarity, did so as well. That page was published on January 8, 2024 and this was the state of this Wikipedia page a couple of days earlier. The lead is the same. Zingo156 (talk) 05:09, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The When to Stream page was actually published on January 17, so I think it is safe to say that they copied and pasted off the Wikipedia article's lead. Zingo156 (talk) 05:11, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

fair enough. brachy08 _{(chat here lol)} 10:00, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Production and development

~~FN 1 does not talk about Guylo Homsy~~
~~FN 2 does not mention Patrick Imbert.~~
FN 3 does not mention The Big Bad Fox and Other Tales...
~~stating → stating that~~

Taken care of! Zingo156 (talk) 11:10, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Last thing has been sorted! Zingo156 (talk) 09:04, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Animation and design

~~requires backgrounds to be fully visualized and rendered instead of suggested seems like a weird style of wording. (Try re-paraphrasing everything needed to be shown)~~
~~FN 9 does not say anything about Meledandri requesting the clouds scene in Migration.~~
~~Where does FN 15 say that Powell and Renner connected over their love of classical music? It only says that Renner is a huge classical music fan.~~

Done! Zingo156 (talk) 09:04, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Release

~~FN 21 does not contain stereoscopic.~~
~~FN 19 does not talk about Ruby Gillman, Teenage Kraken.~~
~~Is FN 23-4 reliable? Additionally, their names aren't formatted properly but that should be an easy fix.~~
~~Is FN 26 reliable?~~
~~FN 27-8 does not mention June 19, 2025~~

All dealt with! Zingo156 (talk) 06:51, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Box office

~~FN 14 and 17 are unreliable.~~

Film Music Reporter is unreliable? But it is used in so many good articles. Zingo156 (talk) 17:02, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No I am pretty sure it is considered reliable. I found this 2023 discussion. Zingo156 (talk) 17:09, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i’ll let this one slide. anyways, some points are left unaddressed but they should be easy fixes. anyways, the final point is well… source archives, but i’ll do it for you. brachy08 _{(chat here lol)} 23:30, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Zingo156 the points are still there… brachy08 _{(chat here lol)} 11:43, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You mean in production and development, or everything you didn't cancel? Sorry for not answering quickly. Zingo156 (talk) 10:03, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

everything i didn't cancel brachy08 _{(chat here lol)} 10:06, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Critical response

La Croix → La Croix's Stephane Dreyfus
FN 39 does not mention anything about predictability.

Reworded the passage to better reflect the LA Times review article! Zingo156 (talk) 11:34, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thanks... will pass brachy08 _{(chat here lol)} 01:19, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.