This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Latin music (music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and the languages of Ibero-America, see project scope for more details) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latin musicWikipedia:WikiProject Latin musicTemplate:WikiProject Latin musicLatin music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
Remove the recording date, as it is only sourced as beginning that year
Remove the word studios from any of the ones in the infobox since that is of the same name as the parameter; Estudios Nadir is an exception because the first word only includes studios as part of it
Either reword the lyrical meaning sentence to make it clear that the lover is Enrique if the source shows this, or change the lead to saying "deals with one" elsewise.
This section is largely out of order currently; the reviews and commercial info for the original should be at the very end of the section, with Enrique's release info coming first then the cover version
On hold until all of the issues are fixed, after a quick review... I will be able to check back post-work on the coming days! --K. Peake08:32, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Kyle Peake:Done, this was easier than I thought it would be and my appointment for the Pfizer shot doesn't come until 12:30 PM EST and the Universal trip has been pushed to tomorrow. Erick (talk) 14:55, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Magiciandude Nice to see a quicker response than expected, but there are still a number of issues that haven't been fixed. The word "studios" is still being used for the first one listed in the infobox, you forgot to end the pipe to pop music, power ballad should be wikilinked to itself per MOS, you need to change nine to 9 per MOS, the cover info all belongs before the song's reception per the title of promotion and reception. Once these are all fixed, I will be happy to pass the article! --K. Peake15:42, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah the lead does look better... the power ballad and nine issues exist in the body too, just for a reminder. --K. Peake17:40, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This definitely looks better; all that needs to be done now is move the info for the cover version to all being before the original's reception, rather than only part of it being there. --K. Peake17:47, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Kyle Peake, I moved the commercial info from the cover version, but I'll be honest, I don't feel strongly about this structure. It's not something I've done for my other GAs in the past. Erick (talk) 22:53, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Magiciandude✓Pass, I did a bit of copyediting by moving the info for the cover to earlier than the reception of the original apart from the chart positions, as that would not make sense with those being before the positions of the original. --K. Peake06:39, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]