Talk:Mid-Continent oil province

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: New Mexico Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	New Mexico portal This article is supported by WikiProject New Mexico.

New Mexico Oil:

Although this province only extends into New Mexico a tiny bit, NM has the second largest reserves of states in the list. There are large oil reserves in NW New Mexico, which are not included in this province or basin or field, or whatever it is called. This should be reflected in the numbers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.253.26.4 (talk) 19:11, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bad title :

The title is nonsense. This is not a oil field but a region of north america with several oil- and gas- bearing basins, each of them with hundreds of oil fields.

Strong agreement. Request comments for a move to "Mid-Continent Oil Province". Cheers Geologyguy 15:14, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hearing no objections for a week, I will make this move now. Geologyguy (talk) 17:20, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The title is an anachronism: 100 years ago, oil men referred to broad producing areas as "fields". But even as an oil-producing province this article makes little sense today, because most modern industry usage would not include the Gulf Coast area in the "Mid-Continent".

It would make most sense to broadedn the scope a bit, and convert the article to cover the oil history of the entire US. Plazak (talk) 14:03, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unless someone objects, I'll move the article over to History of the petroleum industry in the United States

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Mid-Continent oil province. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20041031155619/http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cabs/usa.html to http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cabs/usa.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:51, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]