Talk:Michael Yon/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 20:57, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Ref #26 is a dead link;  Done

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   I note that he has been in conflict with the US military and others. I feel balance would be served by including some detailed criticism.  Done

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

On hold whilst above concerns are addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:12, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

I tried to address both issues. I'm wary of putting any more critical views into the article as it is right now since I don't want to give them undue weight (and this is a BLP, after all). The Squicks (talk) 03:20, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

I understand your concerns and appreciate the efforts that you have made. I am now happy to pass this as a {{WPGood Article|Good Article]]. Congratulations. Jezhotwells (talk) 11:55, 26 October 2009 (UTC)