Talk:Michael Winkler

This article was nominated for deletion on 18 November 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

United States: Ohio Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ohio portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

Please keep, for a while at least. Perhaps change to a stub? Newbie or re Newbie disclaimer: I'd like to go over the Wikipedia guidelines, try things out in the sandbox, perhaps ask for guidance from Wikipedians, as well as check out Winkler's credentials before adding to the entry, but will be busy with work, family, etc. until after the holidays. My colleagues and students are aware of Winkler, but what they find about him tends to be confusing. Since they first hear about him in fields as diverse as art, poetry, mathematics, semiotics, human prehistory, evolution, and so on, potential interest in him doesn't seem too narrow, though its sparseness, again, makes an entry seem potentially more important. And when respected colleagues in different departments know something about him, it suggests he's worth attention, even though I'm not going to try to chase down documentation with Thanksgiving and exams making contradictory demands. My apologies if odd timing brings undue, and perhaps comic, chattiness into this note.

Thank you,

Scout MAP Scout MAP (talk) 05:02, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure from the descriptions what should be done to establish notability in this instance. One possible measure of notability is that the subject has been listed in this category for over a year and none of the many people who've checked the list has questioned its inclusion. So what does one do to establish the importance of an artist who has some adamant fans, but works in a highly esoteric literary and artistic genre that receives little out side confirmation. Perhaps there's a bit of irony in that I'm not the subject or a friend of his but would like to see him included here.

Scout MAP (talk) 10:54, 18 November 2007 (UTC)Scout MAP[reply]

Later addition: I don't know if the on-line references are sufficient to establish notability, and the guidlines I've encountered don't seem to permit print sources for varifiable third party validation. Okay. That's all I can do. If it's not enough, I think it would only be fair not to remove Winkler from the list of Concrete and Visual Poets along with my contribution. His name's been there for over a year. I can supply information on a number of people on this list, which seems to be what Wikipedia is asking for, though this comes largely from my print library. I only started with Winkler because he was at the end of the list, and the list itself shouldn't be mangled if I've been mistaken in trying to add to this section. When I made additions to other sections, such as beginning Bill Keith's entry, last year shortly after his death, I didn't have to have more than one or two on-line sources.

Scout MAP (talk) 11:46, 18 November 2007 (UTC)Scout MAP[reply]

Additional, next day, while waiting. Do well-trafficed blogs count as reliable third party validations? I don't know of any for Winkler, but there are others on the same list who could be documented by them. The people on the Concrete and Visual Poets List aren't likely to see much comment in current on-line newspapers, the only form of notability determiner I could find specified in the instructions.

Scout MAP (talk) 22:26, 18 November 2007 (UTC)Scout MAP[reply]