Talk:Michael Halliday

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Linguistics: Systemic Functional Linguistics Low‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of Systemic Functional Linguistics Task Force, a task force which is currently considered to be defunct.

On 6 June 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved to Michael Halliday (linguist). The result of the discussion was not moved.

Peacocky article

This person sounds remarkable, but perhaps his feats should speak for themselves in the article. The current essay, from "his seminal paper" to his being "one of the pioneers" and in between, comes across strangely like fan-mail. The article states that "he is concerned with."... His work might be "concerned with" this or that, but we will never know what concerns him. --Smokefoot (talk) 16:44, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have removed unsourced references. I will try to follow up these claims and source them - if I can source them, I'll put them back into the article. I hope this is OK - anyone concerned please email me or leave a message here. I am trying to get this entry up to a standard so that the 'warnings' at the top of the article will be able to be removed (Annabelle Lukin (talk) 06:33, 13 January 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Please correct this quote

The quote below is ungrammatical, but it is in quotation marks, so I can't edit without reference to the source. Is this actually the correct form:

"imaginary problems were created by the whole series of dichotomies that Chomsky introduced, or took over unproblematized: not only syntax/semantics but also grammar/lexis, language/thought, competence/performance...Once these dichotomies had been set up, the problem arose of locating and maintaining the boundaries between them linguistics"

There's no clear relationship of the word "linguistics" to what precedes it. A preposition is probably missing, perhaps "in" or "within."zadignose (talk) 09:10, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Meanwhile resolved. No preposition was missing; the word "linguistics" was extraneous.--Frans Fowler (talk) 04:24, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Michael Halliday/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

This essay lists 7 functions, but most of Halliday's literature lists only three: ideational (which is subdivided into logical and experiential), interpersonal, and textual (see, e.g., An Introduction to Functional Grammar, either 2d or 3d editions; On Grammar, vol. 1 in Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday [ed. Jonathan J. Webster]; essays in Linguistic Studies of Text and Discourse, vol. 2 in the Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday [ed. Jonathan J. Webster]). Also, there needs to be citations to Halliday's work. --Jim 20:36, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 20:36, 24 February 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 23:52, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Australian linguist

Until 6 April 2008, the lead paragraph read, "Michael Alexander Kirkwood Halliday (often M.A.K. Halliday) (born 1925) is an English linguist..." It was then edited to read, "... is an Australian linguist..." (and subsequently to "...is a British-born Australian linguist..."). No reference has been provided for the proposition that Halliday is Australian. Is there any reason why "English" should not be restored? --Frans Fowler (talk) 04:15, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Changed to "from England", but retained Australian linguist tag for the time being--Frans Fowler (talk) 06:23, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Michael Halliday. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090106130953/http://sfs.scnu.edu.cn/Halliday/show.aspx?id=67&cid=101 to http://sfs.scnu.edu.cn/halliday/show.aspx?id=67&cid=101

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:45, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 6 June 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) CLYDE ^{TALK TO ME}/_{STUFF DONE} (please mention me on reply) 22:37, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

– no clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC per page views [1] Joeykai (talk) 21:18, 6 June 2023 (UTC)— Relisting. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 03:16, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 06:06, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose—exceptional notability, needing no disambiguation. Tony (talk) 08:24, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This may be why there are 86 incoming wikilinks (I re-linked three to the (linguist) title after relisting). With the DuckDuckGo results showing mostly the linguist, I'm wondering if he is primary by long-term significance. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 18:13, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
(None of those incoming wikilinks are from templates (navboxes, etc.), by the way). Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 18:51, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The linguist is the primary topic according to long-term significance, and probably accounts for over half of the applicable page views as well considering that the author used this as one of just many, many pseudonyms. Dekimasuよ! 02:37, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Systemic Functional Grammar

Are there possibly any defects or shortcomings of M.A.K Halliday's systemic functional grammar that a student should know about? 197.211.53.10 (talk) 13:47, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]