Jump to content

Talk:Michael Catherwood

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

marriage

[edit]

I heard he is divorced now,no longer with his wife jeni..anyone have info? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.235.200.81 (talk) 06:38, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was not aware he had ever been married in the first place. He often speaks very candidly about his lack of success in relationships.Legitimus (talk) 12:12, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

He definitely was married..I believe in 2005 is when he was married to Jenni...last I heard of her was around February 2009 when Mike was talking about receiving a "Happy Ending" at a massage parlor...if you go back to earlier podcasts,or even k&b archive online,you can find all these clips...a few days ago Ralph Garman dropped a small hint favoring that Mike is indeed separated if not divorced from his wife. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.235.235.23 (talk) 08:07, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I know for a fact he is divorced —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.84.154.233 (talk) 21:10, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I beleive it now, because he as explicitly stated on Loveline he was married for about 3 years, and is divorced now. In fact it has come up in conversation several times. Trouble is there are no sources other than the recordings of loveline, I don't remember when he said it, and the details are all very vague.Legitimus (talk) 21:39, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request from Micahnr, 3 March 2011

[edit]

{{edit semi-protected}} Please remove reference 6 as it is not a valid link. Also remove reference 7 because it is a selfpublished chat forum.

Micahnr (talk) 06:18, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Section removed, as there are two issues: Per WP:BLPGOSSIP, the mention of this event at all fails because it was extremely transient and had no lasting effect, and in an article this tiny, such a section would bias the overall tone. Second, there are currently not any objective and reliable sources to this story. Blogs and advocacy based sites and news sources are not acceptable. The fact that you cannot find this story by searching Google News should be telling.Legitimus (talk) 12:59, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Already done Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:58, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Information gone

[edit]

I love how now that he's on DWTS all the mods came over and completely tagged what they felt was not sourced well enough and left his personal info completely out...that's the problem with wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.23.28.142 (talk) 19:53, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to improve the article with reliably-sourced information. tedder (talk) 20:00, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Michael Catherwood. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:12, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]