Jump to content

Talk:Mets–Willets Point station (IRT Flushing Line)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Willets Point-Shea Stadium

[edit]

Since the new field is being built at this train stop and it is called Citi Field, does any one know if this station will also have its named changed or will it still be called Willets Point-Shea Stadium. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.202.75.73 (talk) 15:31, August 24, 2007 (UTC)

Casey Stengel Bus Depot

[edit]

Is there any way we can add the proximity of the Casey Stengel Bus Depot into the article? It is located just east of the station. ----DanTD (talk) 11:18, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

[edit]

Willets Point–Shea Stadium (IRT Flushing Line) → Mets–Willets Point (IRT Flushing Line) — March 2009 map[1] indicates new name — Acps110 (talk) 00:31, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

[edit]
Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.

Discussion

[edit]
Any additional comments:

Google Street View

[edit]

Maybe it's an entrance too? http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q=&aq=0&sll=40.674487,-73.837738&sspn=0.019073,0.038495&ie=UTF8&hq=&hnear=Mets+-+Willets+Point&ll=40.754734,-73.845334&spn=0.008972,0.038495&z=15&layer=c&cbll=40.754724,-73.845338&panoid=JkWf_6MheFWcjx3fcduSEg&cbp=11,275.46,,0,-0.5 193.28.155.226 (talk) 13:34, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. That IP was me, I eventualy found the best view of it. Vcohen (talk) 07:30, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mets–Willets Point (IRT Flushing Line). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:49, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mets–Willets Point (IRT Flushing Line). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:33, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Images

[edit]

@Epicgenius: I am trying to fix the images so the text isn't squeezed between them on either side and am trying to have a couple of them in the history section, but it isn't working for some reason. When you have a chance, can you see what the issue is? Thanks.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 10:38, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kew Gardens 613, I have rearranged the images. The issue is that the infobox is pushing down all the images on the right, so Template:Stack should be used. The other option is to align all the images to the left. epicgenius (talk) 13:51, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Mets–Willets Point station (IRT Flushing Line)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: John M Wolfson (talk · contribs) 03:15, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Prose

[edit]
  • The 1910 Dual Contracts called for extending the lines of the Interborough Rapid Transit Company (IRT) and Brooklyn–Manhattan Transit Corporation (BMT) to Brooklyn, Queens, and the Bronx. Didn't the BMT already have service in Brooklyn?
    • Yes, and the IRT also had lines in the Bronx. However, both companies built additional lines in these boroughs, or they extended their existing lines. (the BMT only had lines in Brooklyn, Manhattan, and Queens, but this isn't important to the article). I have clarified this now. Epicgenius (talk) 00:17, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • the "Willets Point" in the station's name was derived from the boulevard, which in turn was named after the Willets Point peninsula at Fort Totten, three miles (4.8 km) northeast. Should be in the 1920s, not with the Shea Stadium reopening.
    • I put this sentence here because the station's original name was "Willets Point Boulevard". Since the station is at Willets Point Boulevard, it would be redundant to explain that the station is named after the boulevard. Confusion only arose when the station was renamed "Willets Point–Shea Stadium", since Willets Point originally referred to something completely different. Unlike Chicago, NYC doesn't typically drop street suffixes from station names. Epicgenius (talk) 00:17, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Maybe clarify which platforms/tracks are Manhattan-bound, but perhaps northbound and southbound suffice.
  • Breadth checks out. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 03:15, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing

[edit]

Neutrality

[edit]
  • Any explanation for the city as to the half-hearted accessibility? Not to "both sides" it here, but Damen station (CTA Blue Line) is still inaccessible because the CTA says it's hard to renovate it due to its heritage, I wonder if this is something similar. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 03:15, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • A few decades ago, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority created a list of 100 key stations that it planned to make ADA-accessible by 2020. The Mets-Willets Point station wasn't on that list, so the MTA typically wouldn't add any elevators or ramps unless it was part of a five-year capital program or unless a developer paid for it. The ramps to the Flushing-bound side platform already existed, so the MTA chose to rehabilitate these ramps and make them ADA-accessible. There are also ramps to the Manhattan-bound platform, but these ramps are extremely steep and aren't accessible. Sadly, unlike the CTA, the MTA really dragged its feet in making subway stations accessible, so this station probably won't receive elevators unless it's rebuilt. Epicgenius (talk) 00:17, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Images

[edit]

Stability

[edit]

Otherwise good work! Just a few hiccups here and there. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 03:15, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@John M Wolfson: Thanks for the review. I've addressed your comments now, except for the alt text, which I'll add soon. Epicgenius (talk) 00:17, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BorgQueen (talk) 17:07, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(
)
The Mets–Willets Point station
The Mets–Willets Point station

Improved to Good Article status by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 13:56, 15 February 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Mets–Willets Point station (IRT Flushing Line); consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: No - just a concern
  • Interesting: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: @Epicgenius: Good article. Though, the source for alt3 doesn't explicitly state that it opens on Mets games. Though, it does say game days and I'm not knowledgeable on baseball so maybe I'm wrong. Onegreatjoke (talk) 20:27, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Onegreatjoke: Thanks for the review. I have changed ALT3 to just "sports games" - to be honest, I think the platform in question might operate during the US Open as well. Epicgenius (talk) 21:44, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
better. Onegreatjoke (talk) 21:45, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mets–Willets_Point_station_(IRT_Flushing_Line)&oldid=1209023833"