Talk:Metaphor and metonymy
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Another completely useless article
[edit]For the layperson, it's hard to impossible to decipher gibberish. For the expert... they wouldn't need it or would (if still in school) know better sources/textbooks to consult.
But at least it's oh so correct, yay! --jae (talk) 21:57, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- Agreed. Plus, it needs more information on modern discussions in literary theory, etc. Aristophanes68 (talk) 21:44, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Agree, so added a (1st section) last paragraph for laypersons. My "approximation /" may be more loose than needed. Gherson2 (talk) 15:17, 11 October 2020 (UTC)