Talk:Meta Runner

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Meta Runner article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Australia: Television Low‑importance

	Australia portal Meta Runner is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian television (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Animation: Television Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Animated television work group.

Too many self-redirects.

This page has too many "fake links" that simply redirect to this page. I think we should either remove them or create articles for the intended target, since this is too big of an issue to ignore. BlindmanJr (talk) 01:04, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I keep trying to remove them but people keep adding them back. -K-popguardian (talk) 18:32, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is the issue gone, or is it still happening? I'm just wondering. Toad62 20:45, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Only with SMG4's channel name and occasionally Kevin and Luke. - K-popguardian (talk) 21:33, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I want to change the articles that aren't verifiable.

We need sources for one of the articles.Are there sources that we could use to help the character page?ValeAliz (talk) 20:21, 1 January 2021 (UTC)ValeAliz[reply]

What are you talking about? - K-popguardian (talk) 20:30, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I mean what do we put for the sources in the character section? Do we remove the template or we don't remove it? ValeAliz (talk) 23:44, 1 January 2021 (UTC)ValeAliz[reply]

Actually,do we use Youtube as a reliable source?ValeAliz (talk) 16:52, 3 January 2021 (UTC)ValeAliz[reply]

Sorry,I meant to say "sections" and not "articles". I meant if we use any reliable sources for the character section.ValeAliz 03:33, 9 April 2021 (UTC)ValeAliz[reply]

Change main image

Given the design changes across the series, the seasonal posters don't accurately convey the look of the entire show, or their respective seasons themselves for that matter since they're illustrated. I believe an image of the series logo would be more appropriate, like the one from the opening titles (title plays at 0:23). User:SubZeroSilver (talk) 01:46, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Jason Marnocha" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Jason Marnocha and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 21#Jason Marnocha until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 22:43, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Anthony Sardinha" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Anthony Sardinha and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 21#Anthony Sardinha until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 22:44, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion?

This article relies too much on YouTube, which surpise surpise isnt reliable. i'll remove those refs, but i'm really questioning the notablity of the article. SMBMovieFan (talk) 22:22, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Late reply is late, but I agree. The article overall lacks notability beyond a handful of articles discussing its first season. User:SubZeroSilver (talk) 02:18, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe it should. The series has become a vital part of Australian television and has been noted by many sources to be a testament to indie animation within Australia with its ratings and viewership numbers. - K-popguardian (talk) 02:47, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Smg4" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Smg4 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 21#Smg4 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. SMBMovieFan (talk) 22:34, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Bot-Boy" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Bot-Boy has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 26 § Bot-Boy until a consensus is reached. Jeffhardyfan08 (talk) 21:33, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Bot-Boys" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Bot-Boys has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 26 § Bot-Boys until a consensus is reached. Jeffhardyfan08 (talk) 21:33, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Only Up" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Only Up has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 26 § Only Up until a consensus is reached. Jeffhardyfan08 (talk) 21:35, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Should there be a separate page for “Glitch Prouductions?”

it should be treated as a traditional film producer and have its own article Abigbagel (talk) 03:09, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Considering their rise in popularity (looking at you, TADC), there probably should be a page. I might start creating one soon... FerDeLancer (talk) 00:15, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hey that was my idea >:( Abigbagel (talk) 00:38, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]